Confirmatory factor analysis and differential relationships of the two subdomains of negative symptoms in chronically ill psychotic patients

A.P.M. Stiekema, E.J. Liemburg, L. van der Meer, S. Castelein, R. Stewart, J. van Weeghel, A. Aleman, R. Bruggeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research suggests a two factor structure for negative symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders: social amotivation (SA) and expressive deficits (ED). Applying this two-factor structure in clinical settings may provide valuable information with regard to outcomes and to target treatments. We aimed to investigate 1) whether the factor structure is also supported in chronically ill patients with a psychotic disorder and 2) what the relationship is between these factors and functioning (overall functioning and living situation), depressive symptoms and quality of life. 1157 Patients with a psychotic disorder and a duration of illness of 5 years or more were included in the analysis (data selected from the Pharmacotherapy Monitoring Outcome Survey; PHAMOUS). A confirmatory factor analysis was performed using items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale that were previously identified to reflect negative symptoms (N1-4, N6, G5, G7, G13, G16). Subsequently, regression analysis was performed on outcomes. The results confirmed the distinction between SA (N2, N4, G16) and ED (N1, N3, N6, G5, G7, G13) in chronically ill patients. Both factors were related to worse overall functioning as measured with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, ED was uniquely associated with residential living status. Higher scores for SA were associated with more depressive symptoms and worse quality of life. Thus, SA is most strongly related to level of social-emotional functioning, while ED are more related to living situation and thereby are indicative of level of everyday functioning. This subdivision may be useful for research purposes and be a valuable additional tool in clinical practice and treatment development.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0149785
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Factor analysis
Statistical Factor Analysis
Drug therapy
Regression analysis
Health
Depression
Monitoring

Cite this

Stiekema, A.P.M. ; Liemburg, E.J. ; van der Meer, L. ; Castelein, S. ; Stewart, R. ; van Weeghel, J. ; Aleman, A. ; Bruggeman, R. / Confirmatory factor analysis and differential relationships of the two subdomains of negative symptoms in chronically ill psychotic patients. In: PLoS ONE. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 2.
@article{9107d59989124ddaa13d7af6303971e5,
title = "Confirmatory factor analysis and differential relationships of the two subdomains of negative symptoms in chronically ill psychotic patients",
abstract = "Research suggests a two factor structure for negative symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders: social amotivation (SA) and expressive deficits (ED). Applying this two-factor structure in clinical settings may provide valuable information with regard to outcomes and to target treatments. We aimed to investigate 1) whether the factor structure is also supported in chronically ill patients with a psychotic disorder and 2) what the relationship is between these factors and functioning (overall functioning and living situation), depressive symptoms and quality of life. 1157 Patients with a psychotic disorder and a duration of illness of 5 years or more were included in the analysis (data selected from the Pharmacotherapy Monitoring Outcome Survey; PHAMOUS). A confirmatory factor analysis was performed using items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale that were previously identified to reflect negative symptoms (N1-4, N6, G5, G7, G13, G16). Subsequently, regression analysis was performed on outcomes. The results confirmed the distinction between SA (N2, N4, G16) and ED (N1, N3, N6, G5, G7, G13) in chronically ill patients. Both factors were related to worse overall functioning as measured with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, ED was uniquely associated with residential living status. Higher scores for SA were associated with more depressive symptoms and worse quality of life. Thus, SA is most strongly related to level of social-emotional functioning, while ED are more related to living situation and thereby are indicative of level of everyday functioning. This subdivision may be useful for research purposes and be a valuable additional tool in clinical practice and treatment development.",
author = "A.P.M. Stiekema and E.J. Liemburg and {van der Meer}, L. and S. Castelein and R. Stewart and {van Weeghel}, J. and A. Aleman and R. Bruggeman",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0149785",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",
number = "2",

}

Confirmatory factor analysis and differential relationships of the two subdomains of negative symptoms in chronically ill psychotic patients. / Stiekema, A.P.M.; Liemburg, E.J.; van der Meer, L.; Castelein, S.; Stewart, R.; van Weeghel, J.; Aleman, A.; Bruggeman, R.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 11, No. 2, e0149785, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confirmatory factor analysis and differential relationships of the two subdomains of negative symptoms in chronically ill psychotic patients

AU - Stiekema, A.P.M.

AU - Liemburg, E.J.

AU - van der Meer, L.

AU - Castelein, S.

AU - Stewart, R.

AU - van Weeghel, J.

AU - Aleman, A.

AU - Bruggeman, R.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Research suggests a two factor structure for negative symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders: social amotivation (SA) and expressive deficits (ED). Applying this two-factor structure in clinical settings may provide valuable information with regard to outcomes and to target treatments. We aimed to investigate 1) whether the factor structure is also supported in chronically ill patients with a psychotic disorder and 2) what the relationship is between these factors and functioning (overall functioning and living situation), depressive symptoms and quality of life. 1157 Patients with a psychotic disorder and a duration of illness of 5 years or more were included in the analysis (data selected from the Pharmacotherapy Monitoring Outcome Survey; PHAMOUS). A confirmatory factor analysis was performed using items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale that were previously identified to reflect negative symptoms (N1-4, N6, G5, G7, G13, G16). Subsequently, regression analysis was performed on outcomes. The results confirmed the distinction between SA (N2, N4, G16) and ED (N1, N3, N6, G5, G7, G13) in chronically ill patients. Both factors were related to worse overall functioning as measured with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, ED was uniquely associated with residential living status. Higher scores for SA were associated with more depressive symptoms and worse quality of life. Thus, SA is most strongly related to level of social-emotional functioning, while ED are more related to living situation and thereby are indicative of level of everyday functioning. This subdivision may be useful for research purposes and be a valuable additional tool in clinical practice and treatment development.

AB - Research suggests a two factor structure for negative symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders: social amotivation (SA) and expressive deficits (ED). Applying this two-factor structure in clinical settings may provide valuable information with regard to outcomes and to target treatments. We aimed to investigate 1) whether the factor structure is also supported in chronically ill patients with a psychotic disorder and 2) what the relationship is between these factors and functioning (overall functioning and living situation), depressive symptoms and quality of life. 1157 Patients with a psychotic disorder and a duration of illness of 5 years or more were included in the analysis (data selected from the Pharmacotherapy Monitoring Outcome Survey; PHAMOUS). A confirmatory factor analysis was performed using items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale that were previously identified to reflect negative symptoms (N1-4, N6, G5, G7, G13, G16). Subsequently, regression analysis was performed on outcomes. The results confirmed the distinction between SA (N2, N4, G16) and ED (N1, N3, N6, G5, G7, G13) in chronically ill patients. Both factors were related to worse overall functioning as measured with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, ED was uniquely associated with residential living status. Higher scores for SA were associated with more depressive symptoms and worse quality of life. Thus, SA is most strongly related to level of social-emotional functioning, while ED are more related to living situation and thereby are indicative of level of everyday functioning. This subdivision may be useful for research purposes and be a valuable additional tool in clinical practice and treatment development.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0149785

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0149785

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - e0149785

ER -