Conforming to the dominant discourse

Framing distance and multiparty competition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study introduces a measure of framing distance, capturing the degree of frame overlap among parties. Additionally, it provides a causal mechanism explaining differences between parties in framing distance. Parties within PR systems have to take coalition considerations in their stride, and therefore mainstream opposition parties, which have previously governed, are unlikely to adopt large framing distances. Alternatively, challenger parties, those that have never governed, are likely to frame important issues differently. Nonetheless, challengers are expected to reduce their framing distance when performing well in election polls. Electoral success acts as a trigger for these parties to reconsider their goals (policy, office, or votes) and to become more office-seeking. These theoretical propositions are confirmed on the basis of the European integration issue, using a mixed methods approach. Pooled time-series regressions on party manifestos issued by 21 parties between 1987 and 2006 in three political systems (Germany, Netherlands, and UK) are complemented with case study analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)839-868
JournalWest European Politics
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

European integration
political system
time series
coalition
voter
opposition
Netherlands
election
regression
discourse

Cite this

@article{526867801c844604a2b130d01349171d,
title = "Conforming to the dominant discourse: Framing distance and multiparty competition",
abstract = "This study introduces a measure of framing distance, capturing the degree of frame overlap among parties. Additionally, it provides a causal mechanism explaining differences between parties in framing distance. Parties within PR systems have to take coalition considerations in their stride, and therefore mainstream opposition parties, which have previously governed, are unlikely to adopt large framing distances. Alternatively, challenger parties, those that have never governed, are likely to frame important issues differently. Nonetheless, challengers are expected to reduce their framing distance when performing well in election polls. Electoral success acts as a trigger for these parties to reconsider their goals (policy, office, or votes) and to become more office-seeking. These theoretical propositions are confirmed on the basis of the European integration issue, using a mixed methods approach. Pooled time-series regressions on party manifestos issued by 21 parties between 1987 and 2006 in three political systems (Germany, Netherlands, and UK) are complemented with case study analysis.",
author = "{van de Wardt}, Marc",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/01402382.2015.1039378",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "839--868",
journal = "West European Politics",
issn = "0140-2382",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "4",

}

Conforming to the dominant discourse : Framing distance and multiparty competition. / van de Wardt, Marc.

In: West European Politics, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2015, p. 839-868.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conforming to the dominant discourse

T2 - Framing distance and multiparty competition

AU - van de Wardt, Marc

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study introduces a measure of framing distance, capturing the degree of frame overlap among parties. Additionally, it provides a causal mechanism explaining differences between parties in framing distance. Parties within PR systems have to take coalition considerations in their stride, and therefore mainstream opposition parties, which have previously governed, are unlikely to adopt large framing distances. Alternatively, challenger parties, those that have never governed, are likely to frame important issues differently. Nonetheless, challengers are expected to reduce their framing distance when performing well in election polls. Electoral success acts as a trigger for these parties to reconsider their goals (policy, office, or votes) and to become more office-seeking. These theoretical propositions are confirmed on the basis of the European integration issue, using a mixed methods approach. Pooled time-series regressions on party manifestos issued by 21 parties between 1987 and 2006 in three political systems (Germany, Netherlands, and UK) are complemented with case study analysis.

AB - This study introduces a measure of framing distance, capturing the degree of frame overlap among parties. Additionally, it provides a causal mechanism explaining differences between parties in framing distance. Parties within PR systems have to take coalition considerations in their stride, and therefore mainstream opposition parties, which have previously governed, are unlikely to adopt large framing distances. Alternatively, challenger parties, those that have never governed, are likely to frame important issues differently. Nonetheless, challengers are expected to reduce their framing distance when performing well in election polls. Electoral success acts as a trigger for these parties to reconsider their goals (policy, office, or votes) and to become more office-seeking. These theoretical propositions are confirmed on the basis of the European integration issue, using a mixed methods approach. Pooled time-series regressions on party manifestos issued by 21 parties between 1987 and 2006 in three political systems (Germany, Netherlands, and UK) are complemented with case study analysis.

U2 - 10.1080/01402382.2015.1039378

DO - 10.1080/01402382.2015.1039378

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 839

EP - 868

JO - West European Politics

JF - West European Politics

SN - 0140-2382

IS - 4

ER -