Samenhang als rechtswetenschappelijk begrip

Translated title of the contribution: Connected contracts as doctrinal concept

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

300 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Is there a need for recognising connected contracts as a doctrinal concept if the legal system allows sufficient exceptions to privity of contract?
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)499-514
Number of pages16
JournalTijdschrift voor Privaatrecht
Volume52
Issue number2
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

legal system

Keywords

  • connected contracts

Cite this

@article{14747c53daf64835a5fb4cc1df619a85,
title = "Samenhang als rechtswetenschappelijk begrip",
abstract = "Is there a need for recognising connected contracts as a doctrinal concept if the legal system allows sufficient exceptions to privity of contract?",
keywords = "connected contracts",
author = "{TjongTjin Tai}, Eric",
year = "2015",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "52",
pages = "499--514",
journal = "Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht",
issn = "0082-4313",
number = "2",

}

Samenhang als rechtswetenschappelijk begrip. / TjongTjin Tai, Eric.

In: Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht, Vol. 52, No. 2, 2015, p. 499-514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Samenhang als rechtswetenschappelijk begrip

AU - TjongTjin Tai, Eric

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Is there a need for recognising connected contracts as a doctrinal concept if the legal system allows sufficient exceptions to privity of contract?

AB - Is there a need for recognising connected contracts as a doctrinal concept if the legal system allows sufficient exceptions to privity of contract?

KW - connected contracts

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 499

EP - 514

JO - Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht

JF - Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht

SN - 0082-4313

IS - 2

ER -