Constitutional dialogue: An overview

Marnix Snel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

It is clear that 'constitutional dialogue' often serves as a convenient metaphor, but how can we employ it in such a way that it advances contemporary research in public law? This article presents a structured literature review on the subject, draws out certain possible caveats and provides suggestions for how to forge ahead with developing and using the concept of 'constitutional dialogue'. We explore various theoretical approaches to 'constitutional dialogue' in relation to different institutional settings. The concept of constitutional dialogue can be applied in institutional settings beyond courts and legislatures and is increasingly being applied in such a way. As part of our exploration of the implications for legal research we propose distinguishing between the use of 'constitutional dialogue' as a 'lens' and as a 'method' and making a clear choice between empirical and normative analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-140
JournalUtrecht Law Review
Volume9
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

dialogue
public law
metaphor

Keywords

  • Constitutional dialogue
  • Legal Methodology
  • Legal Theory

Cite this

Snel, M. (2013). Constitutional dialogue: An overview. Utrecht Law Review, 9(2), 123-140.
Snel, Marnix. / Constitutional dialogue : An overview. In: Utrecht Law Review. 2013 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 123-140.
@article{bbd7da6c816147b1a32323515ec47e44,
title = "Constitutional dialogue: An overview",
abstract = "It is clear that 'constitutional dialogue' often serves as a convenient metaphor, but how can we employ it in such a way that it advances contemporary research in public law? This article presents a structured literature review on the subject, draws out certain possible caveats and provides suggestions for how to forge ahead with developing and using the concept of 'constitutional dialogue'. We explore various theoretical approaches to 'constitutional dialogue' in relation to different institutional settings. The concept of constitutional dialogue can be applied in institutional settings beyond courts and legislatures and is increasingly being applied in such a way. As part of our exploration of the implications for legal research we propose distinguishing between the use of 'constitutional dialogue' as a 'lens' and as a 'method' and making a clear choice between empirical and normative analysis.",
keywords = "Constitutional dialogue, Legal Methodology, Legal Theory",
author = "Marnix Snel",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "123--140",
journal = "Utrecht Law Review",
issn = "1871-515X",
publisher = "Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services",
number = "2",

}

Snel, M 2013, 'Constitutional dialogue: An overview', Utrecht Law Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 123-140.

Constitutional dialogue : An overview. / Snel, Marnix.

In: Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2013, p. 123-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constitutional dialogue

T2 - An overview

AU - Snel, Marnix

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - It is clear that 'constitutional dialogue' often serves as a convenient metaphor, but how can we employ it in such a way that it advances contemporary research in public law? This article presents a structured literature review on the subject, draws out certain possible caveats and provides suggestions for how to forge ahead with developing and using the concept of 'constitutional dialogue'. We explore various theoretical approaches to 'constitutional dialogue' in relation to different institutional settings. The concept of constitutional dialogue can be applied in institutional settings beyond courts and legislatures and is increasingly being applied in such a way. As part of our exploration of the implications for legal research we propose distinguishing between the use of 'constitutional dialogue' as a 'lens' and as a 'method' and making a clear choice between empirical and normative analysis.

AB - It is clear that 'constitutional dialogue' often serves as a convenient metaphor, but how can we employ it in such a way that it advances contemporary research in public law? This article presents a structured literature review on the subject, draws out certain possible caveats and provides suggestions for how to forge ahead with developing and using the concept of 'constitutional dialogue'. We explore various theoretical approaches to 'constitutional dialogue' in relation to different institutional settings. The concept of constitutional dialogue can be applied in institutional settings beyond courts and legislatures and is increasingly being applied in such a way. As part of our exploration of the implications for legal research we propose distinguishing between the use of 'constitutional dialogue' as a 'lens' and as a 'method' and making a clear choice between empirical and normative analysis.

KW - Constitutional dialogue

KW - Legal Methodology

KW - Legal Theory

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 123

EP - 140

JO - Utrecht Law Review

JF - Utrecht Law Review

SN - 1871-515X

IS - 2

ER -