Abstract
Drawing valid inferences about daily or long-term dynamics of psychological constructs (e.g., depression) requires the measurement model (indicating which constructs are measured by which items) to be invariant within persons over time. However, it might be affected by time- or situation-specific artifacts (e.g., response styles) or substantive changes in item interpretation. To efficiently evaluate longitudinal measurement invariance, and violations thereof, we proposed Latent Markov factor analysis (LMFA), which clusters observations based on their measurement model into separate states, indicating which measures are validly comparable. LMFA is, however, tailored to “discretetime” data, where measurement intervals are equal, which is often not the case in longitudinal data. In this paper, we extend LMFA to accommodate unequally spaced intervals. The so-called “continuous-time” (CT) approach considers the measurements as snapshots of continuously evolving processes. A simulation study compares CT-LMFA parameter estimation to its discrete-time counterpart and a depression data application shows the advantages of CT-LMFA.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 29–42 |
Journal | Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | Suppl 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- LONGITUDINAL DATA
- MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD
- RECOVERY
- continuous-time
- experience sampling
- factor analysis
- latent Markov modeling
- measurement invariance