Contracting outsourced services with collaborative key performance indicators

Henk Akkermans, W. van Oppen, Finn Wynstra, C. Voss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

While service outsourcing may benefit from the application of performance-based contracts (PBCs), the implementation of such contracts is usually challenging. Service performance is often not only dependent on supplier effort but also on the behavior of the buying firm. Existing research on performance-based contracting provides very limited understanding on how this challenge may be overcome. This article describes a design science research project that develops a novel approach to buyer–supplier contracting, using collaborative key performance indicators (KPIs). Collaborative KPIs evaluate and reward not only the supplier contribution to customer performance but also the customer's behavior to enable this. In this way, performance-based contracting can also be applied to settings where supplier and customer activities are interdependent,
while traditional contracting theories suggest that output controls are not effective under such conditions. In the collaborative KPI contracting process, indicators measure both supplier and customer (buying firm) performance and promote collaboration by being defined through a collaborative process and by focusing on end-of-process indicators.The article discusses the original case setting of a telecommunication service provider experiencing critical problems in outsourcing IT services. The initial intervention implementing this contracting approach produced substantial improvements, both in performance and in the relationship between buyer and supplier. Subsequently, the approach was tested and evaluated in two other settings, resulting in a set of actionable propositions on the efficacy of collaborative KPI contracting. Our study demonstrates how defining, monitoring, and incentivizing the performance of specific processes at the buying firm can help alleviate the limitations of traditional performance-based contracting when the supplier's liability for service performance is difficult to verify.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-47
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Outsourcing
Telecommunication services
Monitoring
Key performance indicators
Contracting
Suppliers
Performance-based contracting

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • design science research
  • key performance indicators (KPIs)
  • outsourcing
  • performance management
  • performance-based contracts
  • service procurement

Cite this

Akkermans, Henk ; van Oppen, W. ; Wynstra, Finn ; Voss, C. / Contracting outsourced services with collaborative key performance indicators. In: Journal of Operations Management. 2019 ; Vol. 65, No. 1. pp. 22-47.
@article{b4e4010ef7e94067bb3dcbfcbb35e209,
title = "Contracting outsourced services with collaborative key performance indicators",
abstract = "While service outsourcing may benefit from the application of performance-based contracts (PBCs), the implementation of such contracts is usually challenging. Service performance is often not only dependent on supplier effort but also on the behavior of the buying firm. Existing research on performance-based contracting provides very limited understanding on how this challenge may be overcome. This article describes a design science research project that develops a novel approach to buyer–supplier contracting, using collaborative key performance indicators (KPIs). Collaborative KPIs evaluate and reward not only the supplier contribution to customer performance but also the customer's behavior to enable this. In this way, performance-based contracting can also be applied to settings where supplier and customer activities are interdependent,while traditional contracting theories suggest that output controls are not effective under such conditions. In the collaborative KPI contracting process, indicators measure both supplier and customer (buying firm) performance and promote collaboration by being defined through a collaborative process and by focusing on end-of-process indicators.The article discusses the original case setting of a telecommunication service provider experiencing critical problems in outsourcing IT services. The initial intervention implementing this contracting approach produced substantial improvements, both in performance and in the relationship between buyer and supplier. Subsequently, the approach was tested and evaluated in two other settings, resulting in a set of actionable propositions on the efficacy of collaborative KPI contracting. Our study demonstrates how defining, monitoring, and incentivizing the performance of specific processes at the buying firm can help alleviate the limitations of traditional performance-based contracting when the supplier's liability for service performance is difficult to verify.",
keywords = "collaboration, design science research, key performance indicators (KPIs), outsourcing, performance management, performance-based contracts, service procurement",
author = "Henk Akkermans and {van Oppen}, W. and Finn Wynstra and C. Voss",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/joom.1002",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "22--47",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Contracting outsourced services with collaborative key performance indicators. / Akkermans, Henk; van Oppen, W.; Wynstra, Finn; Voss, C.

In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 22-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contracting outsourced services with collaborative key performance indicators

AU - Akkermans, Henk

AU - van Oppen, W.

AU - Wynstra, Finn

AU - Voss, C.

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - While service outsourcing may benefit from the application of performance-based contracts (PBCs), the implementation of such contracts is usually challenging. Service performance is often not only dependent on supplier effort but also on the behavior of the buying firm. Existing research on performance-based contracting provides very limited understanding on how this challenge may be overcome. This article describes a design science research project that develops a novel approach to buyer–supplier contracting, using collaborative key performance indicators (KPIs). Collaborative KPIs evaluate and reward not only the supplier contribution to customer performance but also the customer's behavior to enable this. In this way, performance-based contracting can also be applied to settings where supplier and customer activities are interdependent,while traditional contracting theories suggest that output controls are not effective under such conditions. In the collaborative KPI contracting process, indicators measure both supplier and customer (buying firm) performance and promote collaboration by being defined through a collaborative process and by focusing on end-of-process indicators.The article discusses the original case setting of a telecommunication service provider experiencing critical problems in outsourcing IT services. The initial intervention implementing this contracting approach produced substantial improvements, both in performance and in the relationship between buyer and supplier. Subsequently, the approach was tested and evaluated in two other settings, resulting in a set of actionable propositions on the efficacy of collaborative KPI contracting. Our study demonstrates how defining, monitoring, and incentivizing the performance of specific processes at the buying firm can help alleviate the limitations of traditional performance-based contracting when the supplier's liability for service performance is difficult to verify.

AB - While service outsourcing may benefit from the application of performance-based contracts (PBCs), the implementation of such contracts is usually challenging. Service performance is often not only dependent on supplier effort but also on the behavior of the buying firm. Existing research on performance-based contracting provides very limited understanding on how this challenge may be overcome. This article describes a design science research project that develops a novel approach to buyer–supplier contracting, using collaborative key performance indicators (KPIs). Collaborative KPIs evaluate and reward not only the supplier contribution to customer performance but also the customer's behavior to enable this. In this way, performance-based contracting can also be applied to settings where supplier and customer activities are interdependent,while traditional contracting theories suggest that output controls are not effective under such conditions. In the collaborative KPI contracting process, indicators measure both supplier and customer (buying firm) performance and promote collaboration by being defined through a collaborative process and by focusing on end-of-process indicators.The article discusses the original case setting of a telecommunication service provider experiencing critical problems in outsourcing IT services. The initial intervention implementing this contracting approach produced substantial improvements, both in performance and in the relationship between buyer and supplier. Subsequently, the approach was tested and evaluated in two other settings, resulting in a set of actionable propositions on the efficacy of collaborative KPI contracting. Our study demonstrates how defining, monitoring, and incentivizing the performance of specific processes at the buying firm can help alleviate the limitations of traditional performance-based contracting when the supplier's liability for service performance is difficult to verify.

KW - collaboration

KW - design science research

KW - key performance indicators (KPIs)

KW - outsourcing

KW - performance management

KW - performance-based contracts

KW - service procurement

U2 - 10.1002/joom.1002

DO - 10.1002/joom.1002

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 22

EP - 47

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

IS - 1

ER -