Contrast and conflict in Dutch vowels

Nadine P. W. D. de Rue, Tineke M. Snijders, Paula Fikkert*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)


The nature of phonological representations has been extensively studied in phonology and psycholinguistics. While full specification is still the norm in psycholinguistic research, underspecified representations may better account for perceptual asymmetries. In this paper, we report on a mismatch negativity (MMN) study with Dutch listeners who took part in a passive oddball paradigm to investigate when the brain notices the difference between expected and observed vowels. In particular, we tested neural discrimination (indicating perceptual discrimination) of the tense mid vowel pairs /o/-/o/ (place contrast), /e/-/o/ (labiality or rounding contrast), and /e/-/o/ (place and labiality contrast). Our results show (a) a perceptual asymmetry for place in the /o/-/o/ contrast, supporting underspecification of [CORONAL] and replicating earlier results for German, and (b) a perceptual asymmetry for labiality for the /e/-/o/ contrast, which was not reported in the German study. A labial deviant [o] (standard /e/) yielded a larger MMN than a deviant [e] (standard /o/). No asymmetry was found for the two-feature contrast. This study partly replicates a similar MMN study on German vowels, and partly presents new findings indicating cross-linguistic differences. Although the vowel inventory of Dutch and German is to a large extent comparable, their (morpho)phonological systems are different, which is reflected in processing.

Original languageEnglish
Article number629648
Number of pages11
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Publication statusPublished - 2021


  • perceptual asymmetry
  • vowels
  • Dutch
  • MMN
  • conflict
  • phonological contrasts


Dive into the research topics of 'Contrast and conflict in Dutch vowels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this