TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrast and conflict in Dutch vowels
AU - de Rue, Nadine P. W. D.
AU - Snijders, Tineke M.
AU - Fikkert, Paula
N1 - This research was supported by grant NWO 322-75-005 “Asymmetries in West-Germanic vowel systems” from the Dutch Science Foundation (NWO) to PF.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The nature of phonological representations has been extensively studied in phonology and psycholinguistics. While full specification is still the norm in psycholinguistic research, underspecified representations may better account for perceptual asymmetries. In this paper, we report on a mismatch negativity (MMN) study with Dutch listeners who took part in a passive oddball paradigm to investigate when the brain notices the difference between expected and observed vowels. In particular, we tested neural discrimination (indicating perceptual discrimination) of the tense mid vowel pairs /o/-/o/ (place contrast), /e/-/o/ (labiality or rounding contrast), and /e/-/o/ (place and labiality contrast). Our results show (a) a perceptual asymmetry for place in the /o/-/o/ contrast, supporting underspecification of [CORONAL] and replicating earlier results for German, and (b) a perceptual asymmetry for labiality for the /e/-/o/ contrast, which was not reported in the German study. A labial deviant [o] (standard /e/) yielded a larger MMN than a deviant [e] (standard /o/). No asymmetry was found for the two-feature contrast. This study partly replicates a similar MMN study on German vowels, and partly presents new findings indicating cross-linguistic differences. Although the vowel inventory of Dutch and German is to a large extent comparable, their (morpho)phonological systems are different, which is reflected in processing.
AB - The nature of phonological representations has been extensively studied in phonology and psycholinguistics. While full specification is still the norm in psycholinguistic research, underspecified representations may better account for perceptual asymmetries. In this paper, we report on a mismatch negativity (MMN) study with Dutch listeners who took part in a passive oddball paradigm to investigate when the brain notices the difference between expected and observed vowels. In particular, we tested neural discrimination (indicating perceptual discrimination) of the tense mid vowel pairs /o/-/o/ (place contrast), /e/-/o/ (labiality or rounding contrast), and /e/-/o/ (place and labiality contrast). Our results show (a) a perceptual asymmetry for place in the /o/-/o/ contrast, supporting underspecification of [CORONAL] and replicating earlier results for German, and (b) a perceptual asymmetry for labiality for the /e/-/o/ contrast, which was not reported in the German study. A labial deviant [o] (standard /e/) yielded a larger MMN than a deviant [e] (standard /o/). No asymmetry was found for the two-feature contrast. This study partly replicates a similar MMN study on German vowels, and partly presents new findings indicating cross-linguistic differences. Although the vowel inventory of Dutch and German is to a large extent comparable, their (morpho)phonological systems are different, which is reflected in processing.
KW - perceptual asymmetry
KW - vowels
KW - Dutch
KW - MMN
KW - conflict
KW - phonological contrasts
KW - MISMATCH NEGATIVITY MMN
KW - NEUROBIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE
KW - REPRESENTATIONS
KW - PERCEPTION
KW - ENGLISH
U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2021.629648
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2021.629648
M3 - Article
SN - 1662-5161
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
M1 - 629648
ER -