TY - JOUR
T1 - Conversational expectations get revised as response latencies unfold
AU - Bögels, Sara
AU - Kendrick, Kobin H.
AU - Levinson, Stephen C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the European Research Council under an advanced [grant number 269484 INTERACT]. This work was supported by the European Research Council under an advanced grant (269484 INTERACT).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/7/2
Y1 - 2020/7/2
N2 - The present study extends neuro-imaging into conversation through studying dialogue comprehension. Conversation entails rapid responses, with negative semiotics for delay. We explored how expectations about the valence of the forthcoming response develop during the silence before the response and whether negative responses have mainly cognitive or social-emotional consequences. EEG-participants listened to questions from a spontaneous spoken corpus, cross-spliced with short/long gaps and “yes”/“no” responses. Preceding contexts biased listeners to expect the eventual response, which was hypothesised to translate to expectations for a shorter or longer gap. “No” responses showed a trend towards an early positivity, suggesting socio-emotional consequences. Within the long gap, expecting a “yes” response led to an earlier negativity, as well as a trend towards stronger theta-oscillations, after 300 milliseconds. This suggests that listeners anticipate/predict “yes” responses to come earlier than “no” responses, showing strong sensitivities to timing, which presumably promote hastening the pace of verbal interaction.
AB - The present study extends neuro-imaging into conversation through studying dialogue comprehension. Conversation entails rapid responses, with negative semiotics for delay. We explored how expectations about the valence of the forthcoming response develop during the silence before the response and whether negative responses have mainly cognitive or social-emotional consequences. EEG-participants listened to questions from a spontaneous spoken corpus, cross-spliced with short/long gaps and “yes”/“no” responses. Preceding contexts biased listeners to expect the eventual response, which was hypothesised to translate to expectations for a shorter or longer gap. “No” responses showed a trend towards an early positivity, suggesting socio-emotional consequences. Within the long gap, expecting a “yes” response led to an earlier negativity, as well as a trend towards stronger theta-oscillations, after 300 milliseconds. This suggests that listeners anticipate/predict “yes” responses to come earlier than “no” responses, showing strong sensitivities to timing, which presumably promote hastening the pace of verbal interaction.
KW - Corpus
KW - EEG
KW - Language comprehension
KW - Pragmatics
KW - Silence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062950547&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2019.1590609
DO - 10.1080/23273798.2019.1590609
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062950547
SN - 2327-3798
VL - 35
SP - 766
EP - 779
JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
IS - 6
ER -