Conversational expectations get revised as response latencies unfold

Sara Bögels*, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study extends neuro-imaging into conversation through studying dialogue comprehension. Conversation entails rapid responses, with negative semiotics for delay. We explored how expectations about the valence of the forthcoming response develop during the silence before the response and whether negative responses have mainly cognitive or social-emotional consequences. EEG-participants listened to questions from a spontaneous spoken corpus, cross-spliced with short/long gaps and “yes”/“no” responses. Preceding contexts biased listeners to expect the eventual response, which was hypothesised to translate to expectations for a shorter or longer gap. “No” responses showed a trend towards an early positivity, suggesting socio-emotional consequences. Within the long gap, expecting a “yes” response led to an earlier negativity, as well as a trend towards stronger theta-oscillations, after 300 milliseconds. This suggests that listeners anticipate/predict “yes” responses to come earlier than “no” responses, showing strong sensitivities to timing, which presumably promote hastening the pace of verbal interaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)766-779
Number of pages14
JournalLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Corpus
  • EEG
  • Language comprehension
  • Pragmatics
  • Silence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conversational expectations get revised as response latencies unfold'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this