Copy alert

A method and metric to detect visual copycat brands

T. Satomura, M. Wedel, R. Pieters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The authors propose a method and metric to quantify the consumer confusion between leading brands and copycat brands that results from the visual similarity of their packaging designs. The method has three components. First, image processing techniques establish the objective similarity of the packages of leading and copycat brands on the basis of their colors and textures. Second, a perceptual decision task (triangle test) assesses the accuracy and speed with which consumers can identify differences between brands from rapidly (300 milliseconds) flashed images of their packages. Third, a competing accumulator model describes the buildup of evidence on each of the alternative brands during consumers’ perceptual decisions and predicts the accuracy and response time of brand identification. Jointly, these components establish the impact of copycat packaging’s visual features on consumer confusion. The method is applied in a test of experimentally designed copycats and market copycats in 15 product categories. A three-tiered metric (“copy alert,” “copy watch,” and “copy safe”) establishes the extent to which copycat brands imitate the package designs of target brands and identifies which visual features are responsible.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
JournalJournal of Marketing Research
Volume51
Issue number1
Early online date13 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Packaging
Texture
Response time
Image processing
Brand identification
Product category

Cite this

@article{85875784be1542178a2d5acc4722b361,
title = "Copy alert: A method and metric to detect visual copycat brands",
abstract = "The authors propose a method and metric to quantify the consumer confusion between leading brands and copycat brands that results from the visual similarity of their packaging designs. The method has three components. First, image processing techniques establish the objective similarity of the packages of leading and copycat brands on the basis of their colors and textures. Second, a perceptual decision task (triangle test) assesses the accuracy and speed with which consumers can identify differences between brands from rapidly (300 milliseconds) flashed images of their packages. Third, a competing accumulator model describes the buildup of evidence on each of the alternative brands during consumers’ perceptual decisions and predicts the accuracy and response time of brand identification. Jointly, these components establish the impact of copycat packaging’s visual features on consumer confusion. The method is applied in a test of experimentally designed copycats and market copycats in 15 product categories. A three-tiered metric (“copy alert,” “copy watch,” and “copy safe”) establishes the extent to which copycat brands imitate the package designs of target brands and identifies which visual features are responsible.",
author = "T. Satomura and M. Wedel and R. Pieters",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1509/jmr.11.0467",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Research",
issn = "0022-2437",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "1",

}

Copy alert : A method and metric to detect visual copycat brands. / Satomura, T.; Wedel, M.; Pieters, R.

In: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 51, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Copy alert

T2 - A method and metric to detect visual copycat brands

AU - Satomura, T.

AU - Wedel, M.

AU - Pieters, R.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - The authors propose a method and metric to quantify the consumer confusion between leading brands and copycat brands that results from the visual similarity of their packaging designs. The method has three components. First, image processing techniques establish the objective similarity of the packages of leading and copycat brands on the basis of their colors and textures. Second, a perceptual decision task (triangle test) assesses the accuracy and speed with which consumers can identify differences between brands from rapidly (300 milliseconds) flashed images of their packages. Third, a competing accumulator model describes the buildup of evidence on each of the alternative brands during consumers’ perceptual decisions and predicts the accuracy and response time of brand identification. Jointly, these components establish the impact of copycat packaging’s visual features on consumer confusion. The method is applied in a test of experimentally designed copycats and market copycats in 15 product categories. A three-tiered metric (“copy alert,” “copy watch,” and “copy safe”) establishes the extent to which copycat brands imitate the package designs of target brands and identifies which visual features are responsible.

AB - The authors propose a method and metric to quantify the consumer confusion between leading brands and copycat brands that results from the visual similarity of their packaging designs. The method has three components. First, image processing techniques establish the objective similarity of the packages of leading and copycat brands on the basis of their colors and textures. Second, a perceptual decision task (triangle test) assesses the accuracy and speed with which consumers can identify differences between brands from rapidly (300 milliseconds) flashed images of their packages. Third, a competing accumulator model describes the buildup of evidence on each of the alternative brands during consumers’ perceptual decisions and predicts the accuracy and response time of brand identification. Jointly, these components establish the impact of copycat packaging’s visual features on consumer confusion. The method is applied in a test of experimentally designed copycats and market copycats in 15 product categories. A three-tiered metric (“copy alert,” “copy watch,” and “copy safe”) establishes the extent to which copycat brands imitate the package designs of target brands and identifies which visual features are responsible.

U2 - 10.1509/jmr.11.0467

DO - 10.1509/jmr.11.0467

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Journal of Marketing Research

JF - Journal of Marketing Research

SN - 0022-2437

IS - 1

ER -