Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Corporate governance and strategic human resource management: Four archetypes and proposals for a new approach to corporate sustainability

  • Graeme Martin
  • , E. Farndale
  • , J. Paauwe
  • , Philip G. Stiles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we develop a new typology connecting strategic human resource management (SHRM) to different models of firm-level corporate governance. By asking questions concerning ownership and control issues in the corporate governance literature and drawing on institutional logics, we build a typological framework that identifies four firm-level archetypes of corporate governance systems. Two archetypes represent dominant logic types (shareholder value, communitarian stakeholder), while the other two represent hybrid organizations (enlightened shareholder value, employee-ownership). Using these archetypes, we theorize the implications of different governance structures for SHRM and the challenges they pose. We conclude by discussing a novel solution to many of these challenges based on the corporate sustainability literature, and, in so doing, provide new directions for SHRM research to tackle key challenges facing organizations and the management of people.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-35
JournalEuropean Management Journal
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Corporate governance
  • Strategic human resource management
  • Institutional logics
  • Hybrid organizations
  • Corporate sustainability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate governance and strategic human resource management: Four archetypes and proposals for a new approach to corporate sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this