Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency

Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey

O.G. De Jonghe, M. Disli, K. Schoors

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

335 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Does better corporate governance unambiguously improve the risk/return efficiency of banks? Or does either a re-orientation of banks' revenue mix towards more opaque products, an economic downturn, or tighter supervision create off-setting or reinforcing effects? The authors relate bank efficiency to shortfalls from a stochastic risk/return frontier. They analyze how internal governance mechanisms (CEO duality, board experience, political connections, and education profile) and external governance mechanisms (discipline exerted by shareholders, depositors, or skilled employees) determine efficiency in a sample of Turkish banks. The 2000 financial crisis was a wakeup call for bank efficiency and corporate governance. As a result, better corporate governance mechanisms have been able to improve risk/return efficiency when the economic, regulatory, and supervisory environments are more stable and bank products are more complex.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherFinance
Number of pages54
Volume2011-129
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2011-129

Fingerprint

Corporate governance
Risk and return
Turkey
Risk-return
Governance mechanisms
Bank efficiency
Corporate governance mechanisms
Supervision
CEO duality
Financial crisis
Internal governance
Education
Employees
Economics
Political connections
Revenue
Economic downturn
Shareholders

Keywords

  • corporate governance
  • bank risk
  • noninterest income
  • crisis
  • frontier

Cite this

De Jonghe, O. G., Disli, M., & Schoors, K. (2011). Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency: Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2011-129). Tilburg: Finance.
@techreport{d0dec4fa283b4d748c4bd0953ec2d949,
title = "Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency: Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey",
abstract = "Does better corporate governance unambiguously improve the risk/return efficiency of banks? Or does either a re-orientation of banks' revenue mix towards more opaque products, an economic downturn, or tighter supervision create off-setting or reinforcing effects? The authors relate bank efficiency to shortfalls from a stochastic risk/return frontier. They analyze how internal governance mechanisms (CEO duality, board experience, political connections, and education profile) and external governance mechanisms (discipline exerted by shareholders, depositors, or skilled employees) determine efficiency in a sample of Turkish banks. The 2000 financial crisis was a wakeup call for bank efficiency and corporate governance. As a result, better corporate governance mechanisms have been able to improve risk/return efficiency when the economic, regulatory, and supervisory environments are more stable and bank products are more complex.",
keywords = "corporate governance, bank risk, noninterest income, crisis, frontier",
author = "{De Jonghe}, O.G. and M. Disli and K. Schoors",
note = "Subsequently published in the Journal of Financial Services Research (2012). This is also EBC Discussion Paper 2011-035 Pagination: 54",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "2011-129",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Finance",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Finance",

}

De Jonghe, OG, Disli, M & Schoors, K 2011 'Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency: Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2011-129, Finance, Tilburg.

Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency : Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey. / De Jonghe, O.G.; Disli, M.; Schoors, K.

Tilburg : Finance, 2011. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2011-129).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency

T2 - Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey

AU - De Jonghe, O.G.

AU - Disli, M.

AU - Schoors, K.

N1 - Subsequently published in the Journal of Financial Services Research (2012). This is also EBC Discussion Paper 2011-035 Pagination: 54

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Does better corporate governance unambiguously improve the risk/return efficiency of banks? Or does either a re-orientation of banks' revenue mix towards more opaque products, an economic downturn, or tighter supervision create off-setting or reinforcing effects? The authors relate bank efficiency to shortfalls from a stochastic risk/return frontier. They analyze how internal governance mechanisms (CEO duality, board experience, political connections, and education profile) and external governance mechanisms (discipline exerted by shareholders, depositors, or skilled employees) determine efficiency in a sample of Turkish banks. The 2000 financial crisis was a wakeup call for bank efficiency and corporate governance. As a result, better corporate governance mechanisms have been able to improve risk/return efficiency when the economic, regulatory, and supervisory environments are more stable and bank products are more complex.

AB - Does better corporate governance unambiguously improve the risk/return efficiency of banks? Or does either a re-orientation of banks' revenue mix towards more opaque products, an economic downturn, or tighter supervision create off-setting or reinforcing effects? The authors relate bank efficiency to shortfalls from a stochastic risk/return frontier. They analyze how internal governance mechanisms (CEO duality, board experience, political connections, and education profile) and external governance mechanisms (discipline exerted by shareholders, depositors, or skilled employees) determine efficiency in a sample of Turkish banks. The 2000 financial crisis was a wakeup call for bank efficiency and corporate governance. As a result, better corporate governance mechanisms have been able to improve risk/return efficiency when the economic, regulatory, and supervisory environments are more stable and bank products are more complex.

KW - corporate governance

KW - bank risk

KW - noninterest income

KW - crisis

KW - frontier

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2011-129

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency

PB - Finance

CY - Tilburg

ER -