Corrections and Gender in Team Collaboration

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While successful teamwork often involves correcting colleagues’ mistakes, it may have negative interpersonal consequences. In an experiment, I show that it also has negative economic consequences: individuals are less willing to collaborate with those who have corrected them, even when the correction benefits the team. The data are consistent with negative feedback aversion: individuals who initially received positive feedback about their ability are significantly less willing to collaborate with those who corrected their mistakes, but not with those who corrected their right actions. Additionally, I find that men, but not women, are more tolerant of women who corrected their right actions. It is potentially due to men’s beliefs about women’s abilities, making women’s corrections of their right actions less ego-threatening. This reluctance to work with those who provide corrective feedback can undermine teamwork, and mixed-gender teams may attract less competent women due to gendered sorting.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherCentER, Center for Economic Research
Pages1-54
Volume2025-008
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2025

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2025-008

Keywords

  • correction
  • collaboration
  • teamwork
  • gender
  • experiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrections and Gender in Team Collaboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this