TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to
T2 - No intolerance of errors "The effect of intolerance of uncertainty on performance monitoring revisited” [Int. J. Psychophysiol. 179 (2022) 77–88, (S0167876022001726), (10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.07.001)]
AU - Malbec, M.
AU - Hindmarsh, J.N.
AU - Jongerling, J.
AU - Franken, I.H.
AU - Wieser, M.J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - The authors regret to acknowledge three errors in the published article. Primarily, discrepancies were identified in Table 1 (p. 83), specifically pertaining to mean and standard deviation values. Although the accurate values are correctly presented in the variable descriptions in Section 2 (Materials and Methods), they were not appropriately reproduced in the table. Additionally, an oversight was noted in the reporting of the mean and standard deviation of the Inhibitory Intolerance of Uncertainty subscale on page 79. Regrettably, these values were erroneously derived from the Beck Depression Inventory, also listed on the same page. The correct values for Inhibitory IU are M = 11.15, SD = 3.68. Upon a thorough re-examination of all analyses, it was discovered that in Table 3 (p. 84), for the worry model in Model 2, the reported beta of the total IU variable was 0.05, whereas the correct value is 0.06. As a result of this investigation, the two first authors also have carefully checked again all analyses using the publicly available R-script and dataset that accompanied the publication (https://osf.io/4mtn3/) and using the raw data. Via this thorough check, we have verified that all other reported values and statistics in the paper are correct. The three errors above constitute unfortunate mistakes; however, importantly, they do not jeopardize the accuracy of any results and interpretations in the paper. Consequently, the conclusions drawn from this study remain unaffected. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors regret to acknowledge three errors in the published article. Primarily, discrepancies were identified in Table 1 (p. 83), specifically pertaining to mean and standard deviation values. Although the accurate values are correctly presented in the variable descriptions in Section 2 (Materials and Methods), they were not appropriately reproduced in the table. Additionally, an oversight was noted in the reporting of the mean and standard deviation of the Inhibitory Intolerance of Uncertainty subscale on page 79. Regrettably, these values were erroneously derived from the Beck Depression Inventory, also listed on the same page. The correct values for Inhibitory IU are M = 11.15, SD = 3.68. Upon a thorough re-examination of all analyses, it was discovered that in Table 3 (p. 84), for the worry model in Model 2, the reported beta of the total IU variable was 0.05, whereas the correct value is 0.06. As a result of this investigation, the two first authors also have carefully checked again all analyses using the publicly available R-script and dataset that accompanied the publication (https://osf.io/4mtn3/) and using the raw data. Via this thorough check, we have verified that all other reported values and statistics in the paper are correct. The three errors above constitute unfortunate mistakes; however, importantly, they do not jeopardize the accuracy of any results and interpretations in the paper. Consequently, the conclusions drawn from this study remain unaffected. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181765244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.112285
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.112285
M3 - Erratum / corrigendum
C2 - 38171250
AN - SCOPUS:85181765244
SN - 0167-8760
VL - 196
JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology
JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology
M1 - 112285
ER -