Grensoverschrijdend bewijsbeslag

Translated title of the contribution: Cross-border attachment of evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article analyses whether the revised Brussels I Regulation (‘Recast’) allows the Dutch courts to order provisional measures intended to obtain or preserve evidence located in another Member State. Recital 25 of the Recast explicitly states that the notion of provisional measures includes these type of orders. The author discusses whether Dutch measures to preserve evidence qualify as provisional measures under the Recast. Possible substantive barriers to granting these measures, such as the Evidence Regulation and territorial limitations, are taken into account in making this assessment. The author further argues that there are – in principle – no obstacles for the Dutch courts to order provisional measures aimed at obtaining or preserving evidence located in another Member State. The problems seem to begin at the enforcement stage. To illustrate this point, the author discusses the possibility of coordinating the moment of serving the order and the moment of enforcing the measure in order to retain the element of surprise and the adaptation of the measure for enforcement in France and Germany. As yet there is not a clear answer as to how the enforcement of these kind of measures in a different Member State will function in practice. Moreover, the problems described equally apply to the enforcement of other provisional measures under the Recast and can be expected to give rise to more questions in the future.
Translated title of the contributionCross-border attachment of evidence
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)477-494
Number of pages18
JournalNederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-border attachment of evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this