Cross-cultural differences in sibling power balance and its concomitants across three age periods

K.L. Buist, A. Metindogan , S. Coban , S. Watve , A. Paranipe , Hans M. Koot, P. Van Lier , Susan Branje, W.H.J. Meeus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We examined cross-cultural differences in (1) sibling power balance and (2) the associations between sibling power balance and internalizing and externalizing problems in three separate cross-cultural studies (early childhood, late childhood, and adolescence). The early childhood samples consisted of 123 Turkish and 128 Dutch mothers (mean age for children was 4.9 years). In the late childhood samples, self-report data were collected from 124 Indian and 129 Dutch children (mean age 10.9 years). In the adolescent samples self-report data were collected from 165 ethnic Moroccan and 165 ethnic Dutch adolescents (mean age 15.2 years). In all studies, questionnaire data on sibling power imbalance and internalizing and externalizing problems were collected. Results showed only one significant cross-cultural difference in sibling power imbalance: The Indian sample reported more sibling power imbalance than the Dutch. Links between sibling power imbalance and problem behavior were highly similar between the different cultural samples. The only significant difference was a stronger impact of sibling power imbalance on externalizing problems for the Dutch compared to the Turkish sample. Concluding, few cross-cultural differences were found in sibling power imbalance. Across cultures and age groups, more sibling power imbalance was linked to more internalizing and externalizing problems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-104
JournalNew Directions for Child and Adolescent Development
Volume156
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Siblings
Self Report
Age Groups
Mothers

Cite this

Buist, K. L., Metindogan , A., Coban , S., Watve , S., Paranipe , A., Koot, H. M., ... Meeus, W. H. J. (2017). Cross-cultural differences in sibling power balance and its concomitants across three age periods. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , 156, 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20199
Buist, K.L. ; Metindogan , A. ; Coban , S. ; Watve , S. ; Paranipe , A. ; Koot, Hans M. ; Van Lier , P. ; Branje, Susan ; Meeus, W.H.J. / Cross-cultural differences in sibling power balance and its concomitants across three age periods. In: New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development . 2017 ; Vol. 156. pp. 87-104.
@article{e4f7d6000a554ec98fdd6c6ab06abc7d,
title = "Cross-cultural differences in sibling power balance and its concomitants across three age periods",
abstract = "We examined cross-cultural differences in (1) sibling power balance and (2) the associations between sibling power balance and internalizing and externalizing problems in three separate cross-cultural studies (early childhood, late childhood, and adolescence). The early childhood samples consisted of 123 Turkish and 128 Dutch mothers (mean age for children was 4.9 years). In the late childhood samples, self-report data were collected from 124 Indian and 129 Dutch children (mean age 10.9 years). In the adolescent samples self-report data were collected from 165 ethnic Moroccan and 165 ethnic Dutch adolescents (mean age 15.2 years). In all studies, questionnaire data on sibling power imbalance and internalizing and externalizing problems were collected. Results showed only one significant cross-cultural difference in sibling power imbalance: The Indian sample reported more sibling power imbalance than the Dutch. Links between sibling power imbalance and problem behavior were highly similar between the different cultural samples. The only significant difference was a stronger impact of sibling power imbalance on externalizing problems for the Dutch compared to the Turkish sample. Concluding, few cross-cultural differences were found in sibling power imbalance. Across cultures and age groups, more sibling power imbalance was linked to more internalizing and externalizing problems.",
author = "K.L. Buist and A. Metindogan and S. Coban and S. Watve and A. Paranipe and Koot, {Hans M.} and {Van Lier}, P. and Susan Branje and W.H.J. Meeus",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/cad.20199",
language = "English",
volume = "156",
pages = "87--104",
journal = "New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development",
issn = "1520-3247",
publisher = "Jossey-Bass Inc.",

}

Buist, KL, Metindogan , A, Coban , S, Watve , S, Paranipe , A, Koot, HM, Van Lier , P, Branje, S & Meeus, WHJ 2017, 'Cross-cultural differences in sibling power balance and its concomitants across three age periods', New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , vol. 156, pp. 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20199

Cross-cultural differences in sibling power balance and its concomitants across three age periods. / Buist, K.L.; Metindogan , A. ; Coban , S. ; Watve , S. ; Paranipe , A. ; Koot, Hans M.; Van Lier , P.; Branje, Susan; Meeus, W.H.J.

In: New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , Vol. 156, 2017, p. 87-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural differences in sibling power balance and its concomitants across three age periods

AU - Buist, K.L.

AU - Metindogan , A.

AU - Coban , S.

AU - Watve , S.

AU - Paranipe , A.

AU - Koot, Hans M.

AU - Van Lier , P.

AU - Branje, Susan

AU - Meeus, W.H.J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We examined cross-cultural differences in (1) sibling power balance and (2) the associations between sibling power balance and internalizing and externalizing problems in three separate cross-cultural studies (early childhood, late childhood, and adolescence). The early childhood samples consisted of 123 Turkish and 128 Dutch mothers (mean age for children was 4.9 years). In the late childhood samples, self-report data were collected from 124 Indian and 129 Dutch children (mean age 10.9 years). In the adolescent samples self-report data were collected from 165 ethnic Moroccan and 165 ethnic Dutch adolescents (mean age 15.2 years). In all studies, questionnaire data on sibling power imbalance and internalizing and externalizing problems were collected. Results showed only one significant cross-cultural difference in sibling power imbalance: The Indian sample reported more sibling power imbalance than the Dutch. Links between sibling power imbalance and problem behavior were highly similar between the different cultural samples. The only significant difference was a stronger impact of sibling power imbalance on externalizing problems for the Dutch compared to the Turkish sample. Concluding, few cross-cultural differences were found in sibling power imbalance. Across cultures and age groups, more sibling power imbalance was linked to more internalizing and externalizing problems.

AB - We examined cross-cultural differences in (1) sibling power balance and (2) the associations between sibling power balance and internalizing and externalizing problems in three separate cross-cultural studies (early childhood, late childhood, and adolescence). The early childhood samples consisted of 123 Turkish and 128 Dutch mothers (mean age for children was 4.9 years). In the late childhood samples, self-report data were collected from 124 Indian and 129 Dutch children (mean age 10.9 years). In the adolescent samples self-report data were collected from 165 ethnic Moroccan and 165 ethnic Dutch adolescents (mean age 15.2 years). In all studies, questionnaire data on sibling power imbalance and internalizing and externalizing problems were collected. Results showed only one significant cross-cultural difference in sibling power imbalance: The Indian sample reported more sibling power imbalance than the Dutch. Links between sibling power imbalance and problem behavior were highly similar between the different cultural samples. The only significant difference was a stronger impact of sibling power imbalance on externalizing problems for the Dutch compared to the Turkish sample. Concluding, few cross-cultural differences were found in sibling power imbalance. Across cultures and age groups, more sibling power imbalance was linked to more internalizing and externalizing problems.

U2 - 10.1002/cad.20199

DO - 10.1002/cad.20199

M3 - Article

VL - 156

SP - 87

EP - 104

JO - New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development

JF - New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development

SN - 1520-3247

ER -