Cross-cultural similarities and differences in motives to forgive

A comparison between and within cultures

Sylvia Huwaë, Juliëtte Schaafsma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Recently, researchers have begun to explore people’s motives to forgive those who have offended them. Using a recall method, we examined whether such motives (relationship-, offender- or self-focused) differ between and within cultures that are more collectivistic (Moluccan Islands in Indonesia) or more individualistic (the Netherlands) and whether this depends on people’s relationship with the offender. More specifically, we examined the idea that
other-focused motives should be more important in cultures that are more collectivistic and that self-focused motives should prevail in more individualistic cultures. We found that Moluccan participants indeed endorsed relationship- and
offender-focused motives more than Dutch participants. Moluccan and Dutch participants did not, however, differ in the extent to which they endorsed self-focused motives. Furthermore, Dutch participants were more likely to endorse
relationship motives (especially in close relations) than self-focused motives. For Moluccan participants, relationship-, offender- and self-focused motives were equally important and also did not depend on how close they were with the
offender. Differences between the samples could not be explained by the extent to which people defined themselves as more independent or interdependent. The implications of these findings for future research on forgiveness motives are
discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2017

Fingerprint

Indonesia
Islands
Netherlands
Offenders

Cite this

@article{1841b3eaddbd4115a3142f4b20f9e7ac,
title = "Cross-cultural similarities and differences in motives to forgive: A comparison between and within cultures",
abstract = "Recently, researchers have begun to explore people’s motives to forgive those who have offended them. Using a recall method, we examined whether such motives (relationship-, offender- or self-focused) differ between and within cultures that are more collectivistic (Moluccan Islands in Indonesia) or more individualistic (the Netherlands) and whether this depends on people’s relationship with the offender. More specifically, we examined the idea thatother-focused motives should be more important in cultures that are more collectivistic and that self-focused motives should prevail in more individualistic cultures. We found that Moluccan participants indeed endorsed relationship- andoffender-focused motives more than Dutch participants. Moluccan and Dutch participants did not, however, differ in the extent to which they endorsed self-focused motives. Furthermore, Dutch participants were more likely to endorserelationship motives (especially in close relations) than self-focused motives. For Moluccan participants, relationship-, offender- and self-focused motives were equally important and also did not depend on how close they were with theoffender. Differences between the samples could not be explained by the extent to which people defined themselves as more independent or interdependent. The implications of these findings for future research on forgiveness motives arediscussed.",
author = "Sylvia Huwa{\"e} and Juli{\"e}tte Schaafsma",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/ijop.12461",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0020-7594",
publisher = "Psychology Press",

}

Cross-cultural similarities and differences in motives to forgive : A comparison between and within cultures . / Huwaë, Sylvia; Schaafsma, Juliëtte.

In: International Journal of Psychology, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural similarities and differences in motives to forgive

T2 - A comparison between and within cultures

AU - Huwaë, Sylvia

AU - Schaafsma, Juliëtte

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Recently, researchers have begun to explore people’s motives to forgive those who have offended them. Using a recall method, we examined whether such motives (relationship-, offender- or self-focused) differ between and within cultures that are more collectivistic (Moluccan Islands in Indonesia) or more individualistic (the Netherlands) and whether this depends on people’s relationship with the offender. More specifically, we examined the idea thatother-focused motives should be more important in cultures that are more collectivistic and that self-focused motives should prevail in more individualistic cultures. We found that Moluccan participants indeed endorsed relationship- andoffender-focused motives more than Dutch participants. Moluccan and Dutch participants did not, however, differ in the extent to which they endorsed self-focused motives. Furthermore, Dutch participants were more likely to endorserelationship motives (especially in close relations) than self-focused motives. For Moluccan participants, relationship-, offender- and self-focused motives were equally important and also did not depend on how close they were with theoffender. Differences between the samples could not be explained by the extent to which people defined themselves as more independent or interdependent. The implications of these findings for future research on forgiveness motives arediscussed.

AB - Recently, researchers have begun to explore people’s motives to forgive those who have offended them. Using a recall method, we examined whether such motives (relationship-, offender- or self-focused) differ between and within cultures that are more collectivistic (Moluccan Islands in Indonesia) or more individualistic (the Netherlands) and whether this depends on people’s relationship with the offender. More specifically, we examined the idea thatother-focused motives should be more important in cultures that are more collectivistic and that self-focused motives should prevail in more individualistic cultures. We found that Moluccan participants indeed endorsed relationship- andoffender-focused motives more than Dutch participants. Moluccan and Dutch participants did not, however, differ in the extent to which they endorsed self-focused motives. Furthermore, Dutch participants were more likely to endorserelationship motives (especially in close relations) than self-focused motives. For Moluccan participants, relationship-, offender- and self-focused motives were equally important and also did not depend on how close they were with theoffender. Differences between the samples could not be explained by the extent to which people defined themselves as more independent or interdependent. The implications of these findings for future research on forgiveness motives arediscussed.

U2 - 10.1002/ijop.12461

DO - 10.1002/ijop.12461

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Psychology

JF - International Journal of Psychology

SN - 0020-7594

ER -