Cross-cultural validation of the patient perception of integrated care survey

Maike V. Tietschert, F. Angeli, Arno J. A. Van Raak, Dirk Ruwaard, Sara J. Singer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Objective

To test the cross‐cultural validity of the U.S. Patient Perception of Integrated Care (PPIC) Survey in a Dutch sample using a standardized procedure.

Data Sources

Primary data collected from patients of five primary care centers in the south of the Netherlands, through survey research from 2014 to 2015.

Study Design

Cross‐sectional data collected from patients who saw multiple health care providers during 6 months preceding data collection.

Data collection

The PPIC survey includes 59 questions that measure patient perceived care integration across providers, settings, and time. Data analysis followed a standardized procedure guiding data preparation, psychometric analysis, and included invariance testing with the U.S. dataset.

Principal Findings

Latent scale structures of the Dutch and U.S. survey were highly comparable. Factor “Integration with specialist” had lower reliability scores and noninvariance. For the remaining factors, internal consistency and invariance estimates were strong.

Conclusions

The standardized cross‐cultural validation procedure produced strong support for comparable psychometric characteristics of the Dutch and U.S. surveys. Future research should examine the usability of the proposed procedure for contexts with greater cultural differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1745-1776
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Health Personnel
Netherlands
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural validation
  • standardization
  • health system outcome measures
  • Patient Perception of Integrated Care Survey
  • OF-FIT INDEXES
  • PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
  • CONSUMER ASSESSMENT
  • HOSPITAL SURVEY
  • HEALTH PLANS
  • QUALITY
  • INSTRUMENTS
  • VERSION
  • QUESTIONNAIRES
  • TRANSLATION

Cite this

Tietschert, M. V., Angeli, F., Van Raak, A. J. A., Ruwaard, D., & Singer, S. J. (2018). Cross-cultural validation of the patient perception of integrated care survey. Health Services Research, 53(3), 1745-1776. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12741
Tietschert, Maike V. ; Angeli, F. ; Van Raak, Arno J. A. ; Ruwaard, Dirk ; Singer, Sara J. / Cross-cultural validation of the patient perception of integrated care survey. In: Health Services Research. 2018 ; Vol. 53, No. 3. pp. 1745-1776.
@article{3329209c3fea46708aedd96552cddc2c,
title = "Cross-cultural validation of the patient perception of integrated care survey",
abstract = "ObjectiveTo test the cross‐cultural validity of the U.S. Patient Perception of Integrated Care (PPIC) Survey in a Dutch sample using a standardized procedure.Data SourcesPrimary data collected from patients of five primary care centers in the south of the Netherlands, through survey research from 2014 to 2015.Study DesignCross‐sectional data collected from patients who saw multiple health care providers during 6 months preceding data collection.Data collectionThe PPIC survey includes 59 questions that measure patient perceived care integration across providers, settings, and time. Data analysis followed a standardized procedure guiding data preparation, psychometric analysis, and included invariance testing with the U.S. dataset.Principal FindingsLatent scale structures of the Dutch and U.S. survey were highly comparable. Factor “Integration with specialist” had lower reliability scores and noninvariance. For the remaining factors, internal consistency and invariance estimates were strong.ConclusionsThe standardized cross‐cultural validation procedure produced strong support for comparable psychometric characteristics of the Dutch and U.S. surveys. Future research should examine the usability of the proposed procedure for contexts with greater cultural differences.",
keywords = "Cross-cultural validation, standardization, health system outcome measures, Patient Perception of Integrated Care Survey, OF-FIT INDEXES, PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES, CONSUMER ASSESSMENT, HOSPITAL SURVEY, HEALTH PLANS, QUALITY, INSTRUMENTS, VERSION, QUESTIONNAIRES, TRANSLATION",
author = "Tietschert, {Maike V.} and F. Angeli and {Van Raak}, {Arno J. A.} and Dirk Ruwaard and Singer, {Sara J.}",
note = "{\circledC} Health Research and Educational Trust.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.12741",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1745--1776",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Tietschert, MV, Angeli, F, Van Raak, AJA, Ruwaard, D & Singer, SJ 2018, 'Cross-cultural validation of the patient perception of integrated care survey', Health Services Research, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1745-1776. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12741

Cross-cultural validation of the patient perception of integrated care survey. / Tietschert, Maike V.; Angeli, F.; Van Raak, Arno J. A.; Ruwaard, Dirk; Singer, Sara J.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2018, p. 1745-1776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural validation of the patient perception of integrated care survey

AU - Tietschert, Maike V.

AU - Angeli, F.

AU - Van Raak, Arno J. A.

AU - Ruwaard, Dirk

AU - Singer, Sara J.

N1 - © Health Research and Educational Trust.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - ObjectiveTo test the cross‐cultural validity of the U.S. Patient Perception of Integrated Care (PPIC) Survey in a Dutch sample using a standardized procedure.Data SourcesPrimary data collected from patients of five primary care centers in the south of the Netherlands, through survey research from 2014 to 2015.Study DesignCross‐sectional data collected from patients who saw multiple health care providers during 6 months preceding data collection.Data collectionThe PPIC survey includes 59 questions that measure patient perceived care integration across providers, settings, and time. Data analysis followed a standardized procedure guiding data preparation, psychometric analysis, and included invariance testing with the U.S. dataset.Principal FindingsLatent scale structures of the Dutch and U.S. survey were highly comparable. Factor “Integration with specialist” had lower reliability scores and noninvariance. For the remaining factors, internal consistency and invariance estimates were strong.ConclusionsThe standardized cross‐cultural validation procedure produced strong support for comparable psychometric characteristics of the Dutch and U.S. surveys. Future research should examine the usability of the proposed procedure for contexts with greater cultural differences.

AB - ObjectiveTo test the cross‐cultural validity of the U.S. Patient Perception of Integrated Care (PPIC) Survey in a Dutch sample using a standardized procedure.Data SourcesPrimary data collected from patients of five primary care centers in the south of the Netherlands, through survey research from 2014 to 2015.Study DesignCross‐sectional data collected from patients who saw multiple health care providers during 6 months preceding data collection.Data collectionThe PPIC survey includes 59 questions that measure patient perceived care integration across providers, settings, and time. Data analysis followed a standardized procedure guiding data preparation, psychometric analysis, and included invariance testing with the U.S. dataset.Principal FindingsLatent scale structures of the Dutch and U.S. survey were highly comparable. Factor “Integration with specialist” had lower reliability scores and noninvariance. For the remaining factors, internal consistency and invariance estimates were strong.ConclusionsThe standardized cross‐cultural validation procedure produced strong support for comparable psychometric characteristics of the Dutch and U.S. surveys. Future research should examine the usability of the proposed procedure for contexts with greater cultural differences.

KW - Cross-cultural validation

KW - standardization

KW - health system outcome measures

KW - Patient Perception of Integrated Care Survey

KW - OF-FIT INDEXES

KW - PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES

KW - CONSUMER ASSESSMENT

KW - HOSPITAL SURVEY

KW - HEALTH PLANS

KW - QUALITY

KW - INSTRUMENTS

KW - VERSION

KW - QUESTIONNAIRES

KW - TRANSLATION

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12741

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12741

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 1745

EP - 1776

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 3

ER -