Kruisiging van Jezus was niet uniek

Translated title of the contribution: Crucifixion of Jesus was not unique

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlePopular

Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)22
Number of pages1
JournalTrouw
Publication statusPublished - 23 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Jesus
  • Crucifixion
  • Slavery
  • Ancient Judaism

Cite this

@article{d50f2adfa48e46eaad4452bd03c70c09,
title = "Kruisiging van Jezus was niet uniek",
keywords = "Jesus, Crucifixion, Slavery, Ancient Judaism",
author = "Martijn Stoutjesdijk",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "23",
language = "Dutch",
pages = "22",
journal = "Trouw",

}

Kruisiging van Jezus was niet uniek. / Stoutjesdijk, Martijn.

In: Trouw, 23.03.2016, p. 22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlePopular

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kruisiging van Jezus was niet uniek

AU - Stoutjesdijk, Martijn

PY - 2016/3/23

Y1 - 2016/3/23

KW - Jesus

KW - Crucifixion

KW - Slavery

KW - Ancient Judaism

M3 - Article

SP - 22

JO - Trouw

JF - Trouw

ER -