Cultural priming as a tool to understand multiculturalism and culture

Arzu Aydinli, Michael Bender

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

105 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

What is multiculturalism, and how is it typically studied? The current paper provides answers to these questions by introducing approaches to the study of multiculturalism and their implications. We first present the view of multiculturalism as a static and dispositional phenomenon (i.e., demographic, as well as most uni- and bidimensional conceptualizations of acculturation) and then focus on more dynamic approaches to multiculturalism, that view culture as emerging from domain-specificity, situated cognition, or as a dynamic constructivist process. As part of a dynamic approach to culture, two prominent techniques of priming cultural orientations (i.e., priming Individualism - Collectivism versus Cultural Frame Switching) are introduced and compared, and implications are outlined. We propose that it is necessary to perceive culture as more than a categorical variable that is stable over situations, and highlight future research avenues that might help to further advance our understanding of multiculturalism and culture as dynamic constructs.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOnline Readings in Psychology and Culture
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Multiculturalism
Priming
Situated cognition
Acculturation
Conceptualization
Individualism/collectivism
Demographics
Dynamic process
Specificity
Cultural orientation
Categorical variables

Cite this

@article{246b3e23f111410aada2199ab2c4618e,
title = "Cultural priming as a tool to understand multiculturalism and culture",
abstract = "What is multiculturalism, and how is it typically studied? The current paper provides answers to these questions by introducing approaches to the study of multiculturalism and their implications. We first present the view of multiculturalism as a static and dispositional phenomenon (i.e., demographic, as well as most uni- and bidimensional conceptualizations of acculturation) and then focus on more dynamic approaches to multiculturalism, that view culture as emerging from domain-specificity, situated cognition, or as a dynamic constructivist process. As part of a dynamic approach to culture, two prominent techniques of priming cultural orientations (i.e., priming Individualism - Collectivism versus Cultural Frame Switching) are introduced and compared, and implications are outlined. We propose that it is necessary to perceive culture as more than a categorical variable that is stable over situations, and highlight future research avenues that might help to further advance our understanding of multiculturalism and culture as dynamic constructs.",
author = "Arzu Aydinli and Michael Bender",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.9707/2307-0919.1134",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Online Readings in Psychology and Culture",
issn = "2307-0919",
number = "1",

}

Cultural priming as a tool to understand multiculturalism and culture. / Aydinli, Arzu; Bender, Michael.

In: Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cultural priming as a tool to understand multiculturalism and culture

AU - Aydinli, Arzu

AU - Bender, Michael

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - What is multiculturalism, and how is it typically studied? The current paper provides answers to these questions by introducing approaches to the study of multiculturalism and their implications. We first present the view of multiculturalism as a static and dispositional phenomenon (i.e., demographic, as well as most uni- and bidimensional conceptualizations of acculturation) and then focus on more dynamic approaches to multiculturalism, that view culture as emerging from domain-specificity, situated cognition, or as a dynamic constructivist process. As part of a dynamic approach to culture, two prominent techniques of priming cultural orientations (i.e., priming Individualism - Collectivism versus Cultural Frame Switching) are introduced and compared, and implications are outlined. We propose that it is necessary to perceive culture as more than a categorical variable that is stable over situations, and highlight future research avenues that might help to further advance our understanding of multiculturalism and culture as dynamic constructs.

AB - What is multiculturalism, and how is it typically studied? The current paper provides answers to these questions by introducing approaches to the study of multiculturalism and their implications. We first present the view of multiculturalism as a static and dispositional phenomenon (i.e., demographic, as well as most uni- and bidimensional conceptualizations of acculturation) and then focus on more dynamic approaches to multiculturalism, that view culture as emerging from domain-specificity, situated cognition, or as a dynamic constructivist process. As part of a dynamic approach to culture, two prominent techniques of priming cultural orientations (i.e., priming Individualism - Collectivism versus Cultural Frame Switching) are introduced and compared, and implications are outlined. We propose that it is necessary to perceive culture as more than a categorical variable that is stable over situations, and highlight future research avenues that might help to further advance our understanding of multiculturalism and culture as dynamic constructs.

U2 - 10.9707/2307-0919.1134

DO - 10.9707/2307-0919.1134

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - Online Readings in Psychology and Culture

JF - Online Readings in Psychology and Culture

SN - 2307-0919

IS - 1

ER -