Culture and Development: An Analytical Framework

P. Francois, J. Zabojnik

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

244 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper develops a framework which analyzes how a population's culture affects the decisions of rational profit maximizing firms, while simultaneously exploring how the actions of these firms in turn affect the population's culture.By endogenizing culture as well as the more usual economic variables, it shows how an economically valuablebehavioural trait can be sustained as part of a competitive equilibrium.It is shown that, for given primitives, an economy can be in either a 'good' steady state, in which the valuable cultural trait is present, or a welfare dominated 'bad' one in which the valuable cultural trait disappears.Starting from the 'good' steady state and implementing productivity improvements raises welfare, but if changes are too rapid this steady state will not be reached from the old one.Instead, the unique trajectory is to the bad steady state where welfare is reduced.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherMacroeconomics
Number of pages41
Volume2001-25
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2001-25

Fingerprint

Competitive equilibrium
Productivity improvement
Economic variables
Profit
Trajectory

Keywords

  • culture
  • development
  • inequality
  • technological change

Cite this

Francois, P., & Zabojnik, J. (2001). Culture and Development: An Analytical Framework. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2001-25). Tilburg: Macroeconomics.
Francois, P. ; Zabojnik, J. / Culture and Development : An Analytical Framework. Tilburg : Macroeconomics, 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{1685c9e0b3c0438f9f2efe129ed75d02,
title = "Culture and Development: An Analytical Framework",
abstract = "This paper develops a framework which analyzes how a population's culture affects the decisions of rational profit maximizing firms, while simultaneously exploring how the actions of these firms in turn affect the population's culture.By endogenizing culture as well as the more usual economic variables, it shows how an economically valuablebehavioural trait can be sustained as part of a competitive equilibrium.It is shown that, for given primitives, an economy can be in either a 'good' steady state, in which the valuable cultural trait is present, or a welfare dominated 'bad' one in which the valuable cultural trait disappears.Starting from the 'good' steady state and implementing productivity improvements raises welfare, but if changes are too rapid this steady state will not be reached from the old one.Instead, the unique trajectory is to the bad steady state where welfare is reduced.",
keywords = "culture, development, inequality, technological change",
author = "P. Francois and J. Zabojnik",
note = "Pagination: 41",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "2001-25",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Macroeconomics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Macroeconomics",

}

Francois, P & Zabojnik, J 2001 'Culture and Development: An Analytical Framework' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2001-25, Macroeconomics, Tilburg.

Culture and Development : An Analytical Framework. / Francois, P.; Zabojnik, J.

Tilburg : Macroeconomics, 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2001-25).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Culture and Development

T2 - An Analytical Framework

AU - Francois, P.

AU - Zabojnik, J.

N1 - Pagination: 41

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This paper develops a framework which analyzes how a population's culture affects the decisions of rational profit maximizing firms, while simultaneously exploring how the actions of these firms in turn affect the population's culture.By endogenizing culture as well as the more usual economic variables, it shows how an economically valuablebehavioural trait can be sustained as part of a competitive equilibrium.It is shown that, for given primitives, an economy can be in either a 'good' steady state, in which the valuable cultural trait is present, or a welfare dominated 'bad' one in which the valuable cultural trait disappears.Starting from the 'good' steady state and implementing productivity improvements raises welfare, but if changes are too rapid this steady state will not be reached from the old one.Instead, the unique trajectory is to the bad steady state where welfare is reduced.

AB - This paper develops a framework which analyzes how a population's culture affects the decisions of rational profit maximizing firms, while simultaneously exploring how the actions of these firms in turn affect the population's culture.By endogenizing culture as well as the more usual economic variables, it shows how an economically valuablebehavioural trait can be sustained as part of a competitive equilibrium.It is shown that, for given primitives, an economy can be in either a 'good' steady state, in which the valuable cultural trait is present, or a welfare dominated 'bad' one in which the valuable cultural trait disappears.Starting from the 'good' steady state and implementing productivity improvements raises welfare, but if changes are too rapid this steady state will not be reached from the old one.Instead, the unique trajectory is to the bad steady state where welfare is reduced.

KW - culture

KW - development

KW - inequality

KW - technological change

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2001-25

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Culture and Development

PB - Macroeconomics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Francois P, Zabojnik J. Culture and Development: An Analytical Framework. Tilburg: Macroeconomics. 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper).