Dara Hallinan & Paul De Hert, ‘Many have it wrong – Samples do contain personal data

The data protection regulation as a superior framework 
to protect donor interests in biobanking and genomic research

Dara Hallinan, Paul de Hert

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Genomic research relies on the availability of genomic data. Detached biological samples, stored in facilities known as biobanks, are the source of this data. Donors have interests in these samples. In particular, donors have interests in samples by virtue of the personal data they contain. In relation to this observation, this article puts forward three arguments. First: The current European legislative framework relating to samples is inadequate. This inadequacy results from not understanding samples in terms of the information they contain. Second: European data protection law, in particular as outlined in the forthcoming Data Protection Regulation, might be looked as a source of solutions. However, whether data protection law can apply to samples at all remains a subject of debate. One key argument supports the position that it cannot: Samples are not data, but rather are physical mater, and therefore can only a source of data. Third: The assertion that ‘samples are not data, but rather only physical matter’ is flawed. Samples do contain data – DNA is data. DNA is understood as information both popularly and in the genetic sciences. In fact, even in informatics, DNA can be understood as data.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe ethics of biomedical big data
EditorsB.D. Mittelstadt, L. Floridi
Place of PublicationDordrecht
PublisherSpringer Publishers
Pages119-138
Number of pages20
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-33525-4
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

data protection
personal data
regulation
Law

Keywords

  • genetic privacy

Cite this

@inbook{f59591cadf064fd3961c43154050ffc4,
title = "Dara Hallinan & Paul De Hert, ‘Many have it wrong – Samples do contain personal data: The data protection regulation as a superior framework 
to protect donor interests in biobanking and genomic research",
abstract = "Genomic research relies on the availability of genomic data. Detached biological samples, stored in facilities known as biobanks, are the source of this data. Donors have interests in these samples. In particular, donors have interests in samples by virtue of the personal data they contain. In relation to this observation, this article puts forward three arguments. First: The current European legislative framework relating to samples is inadequate. This inadequacy results from not understanding samples in terms of the information they contain. Second: European data protection law, in particular as outlined in the forthcoming Data Protection Regulation, might be looked as a source of solutions. However, whether data protection law can apply to samples at all remains a subject of debate. One key argument supports the position that it cannot: Samples are not data, but rather are physical mater, and therefore can only a source of data. Third: The assertion that ‘samples are not data, but rather only physical matter’ is flawed. Samples do contain data – DNA is data. DNA is understood as information both popularly and in the genetic sciences. In fact, even in informatics, DNA can be understood as data.",
keywords = "genetic privacy",
author = "Dara Hallinan and {de Hert}, Paul",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-33525-4",
pages = "119--138",
editor = "B.D. Mittelstadt and L. Floridi",
booktitle = "The ethics of biomedical big data",
publisher = "Springer Publishers",

}

Dara Hallinan & Paul De Hert, ‘Many have it wrong – Samples do contain personal data : The data protection regulation as a superior framework 
to protect donor interests in biobanking and genomic research. / Hallinan, Dara; de Hert, Paul.

The ethics of biomedical big data. ed. / B.D. Mittelstadt; L. Floridi. Dordrecht : Springer Publishers, 2016. p. 119-138.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Dara Hallinan & Paul De Hert, ‘Many have it wrong – Samples do contain personal data

T2 - The data protection regulation as a superior framework 
to protect donor interests in biobanking and genomic research

AU - Hallinan, Dara

AU - de Hert, Paul

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Genomic research relies on the availability of genomic data. Detached biological samples, stored in facilities known as biobanks, are the source of this data. Donors have interests in these samples. In particular, donors have interests in samples by virtue of the personal data they contain. In relation to this observation, this article puts forward three arguments. First: The current European legislative framework relating to samples is inadequate. This inadequacy results from not understanding samples in terms of the information they contain. Second: European data protection law, in particular as outlined in the forthcoming Data Protection Regulation, might be looked as a source of solutions. However, whether data protection law can apply to samples at all remains a subject of debate. One key argument supports the position that it cannot: Samples are not data, but rather are physical mater, and therefore can only a source of data. Third: The assertion that ‘samples are not data, but rather only physical matter’ is flawed. Samples do contain data – DNA is data. DNA is understood as information both popularly and in the genetic sciences. In fact, even in informatics, DNA can be understood as data.

AB - Genomic research relies on the availability of genomic data. Detached biological samples, stored in facilities known as biobanks, are the source of this data. Donors have interests in these samples. In particular, donors have interests in samples by virtue of the personal data they contain. In relation to this observation, this article puts forward three arguments. First: The current European legislative framework relating to samples is inadequate. This inadequacy results from not understanding samples in terms of the information they contain. Second: European data protection law, in particular as outlined in the forthcoming Data Protection Regulation, might be looked as a source of solutions. However, whether data protection law can apply to samples at all remains a subject of debate. One key argument supports the position that it cannot: Samples are not data, but rather are physical mater, and therefore can only a source of data. Third: The assertion that ‘samples are not data, but rather only physical matter’ is flawed. Samples do contain data – DNA is data. DNA is understood as information both popularly and in the genetic sciences. In fact, even in informatics, DNA can be understood as data.

KW - genetic privacy

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-33525-4

SP - 119

EP - 138

BT - The ethics of biomedical big data

A2 - Mittelstadt, B.D.

A2 - Floridi, L.

PB - Springer Publishers

CY - Dordrecht

ER -