Abstract
Despite the increasing amounts of data generated by disruptive technologies, such as smart sensors, the use of this data in condition-based monitoring of critical infrastructural assets is still at its infancy. One main challenge is the exchange of data between owners of critical infrastructures assets, and their maintenance contractors. Our case analyses reveal three root causes of lack of data sharing: 1) a mismatch between contract specification (i.e., provisions) and contract evaluation (i.e., KPIs); 2) ineffective incentive schemes (i.e., tied to the wrong provisions or lacking salience); 3) a lack of contractual flexibility to accommodate and facilitate data sharing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 26th EurOMA 2019 Conference |
| Subtitle of host publication | Operations Adding Value to Society |
| Place of Publication | Helsinki |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
| Event | 26th European Operations Management Association 2019 - Hanken Svenska Handelshogskolan, Helsinki, Finland Duration: 17 Jun 2019 → 19 Jun 2019 |
Conference
| Conference | 26th European Operations Management Association 2019 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | EurOMA 2019 |
| Country/Territory | Finland |
| City | Helsinki |
| Period | 17/06/19 → 19/06/19 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Outsourcing
- Data-Driven Innovations
- condition-based maintenance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Data transfer in maintenance outsourcing relationships: The case of the Dutch public infrastructures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver