Delivering a victim impact statement

Emotionally effective or counter-productive?

K.M.E. Lens, A. Pemberton, Brans K., J. Braeken, S. Bogaerts, A. Lahlah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Although the delivery of a Victim Impact Statement (VIS) in court is assumed to contribute to the healing and recovery process of victims of violent crimes, its effectiveness to facilitate emotional recovery is widely debated. The current longitudinal study is the first to empirically examine the psychological effects of delivering a VIS in terms of the two most important emotional reactions after crime: anger and anxiety. It extends previous findings by showing that the debate concerning the effectiveness of delivering a VIS is not a ‘black and white’ matter. In this article, we argue that the question should not be whether delivering a VIS ‘works’ or ‘doesn’t work’ for the victim, but for whom, and under which conditions. We show that delivering a VIS does not give rise to direct ‘therapeutic’ effects. However, we found that feelings of anger and anxiety decrease for victims who experience more control over their recovery process and higher levels of procedural justice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-34
JournalEuropean Journal of Criminology
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

anger
anxiety
violent crime
longitudinal study
justice
offense
experience

Cite this

@article{edb6ae28983f401daafddf82d3d89481,
title = "Delivering a victim impact statement: Emotionally effective or counter-productive?",
abstract = "Although the delivery of a Victim Impact Statement (VIS) in court is assumed to contribute to the healing and recovery process of victims of violent crimes, its effectiveness to facilitate emotional recovery is widely debated. The current longitudinal study is the first to empirically examine the psychological effects of delivering a VIS in terms of the two most important emotional reactions after crime: anger and anxiety. It extends previous findings by showing that the debate concerning the effectiveness of delivering a VIS is not a ‘black and white’ matter. In this article, we argue that the question should not be whether delivering a VIS ‘works’ or ‘doesn’t work’ for the victim, but for whom, and under which conditions. We show that delivering a VIS does not give rise to direct ‘therapeutic’ effects. However, we found that feelings of anger and anxiety decrease for victims who experience more control over their recovery process and higher levels of procedural justice.",
author = "K.M.E. Lens and A. Pemberton and Brans K. and J. Braeken and S. Bogaerts and A. Lahlah",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/1477370814538778",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "17--34",
journal = "European Journal of Criminology",
issn = "1477-3708",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Delivering a victim impact statement : Emotionally effective or counter-productive? / Lens, K.M.E.; Pemberton, A.; K., Brans; Braeken, J.; Bogaerts, S.; Lahlah, A.

In: European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2015, p. 17-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delivering a victim impact statement

T2 - Emotionally effective or counter-productive?

AU - Lens, K.M.E.

AU - Pemberton, A.

AU - K., Brans

AU - Braeken, J.

AU - Bogaerts, S.

AU - Lahlah, A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Although the delivery of a Victim Impact Statement (VIS) in court is assumed to contribute to the healing and recovery process of victims of violent crimes, its effectiveness to facilitate emotional recovery is widely debated. The current longitudinal study is the first to empirically examine the psychological effects of delivering a VIS in terms of the two most important emotional reactions after crime: anger and anxiety. It extends previous findings by showing that the debate concerning the effectiveness of delivering a VIS is not a ‘black and white’ matter. In this article, we argue that the question should not be whether delivering a VIS ‘works’ or ‘doesn’t work’ for the victim, but for whom, and under which conditions. We show that delivering a VIS does not give rise to direct ‘therapeutic’ effects. However, we found that feelings of anger and anxiety decrease for victims who experience more control over their recovery process and higher levels of procedural justice.

AB - Although the delivery of a Victim Impact Statement (VIS) in court is assumed to contribute to the healing and recovery process of victims of violent crimes, its effectiveness to facilitate emotional recovery is widely debated. The current longitudinal study is the first to empirically examine the psychological effects of delivering a VIS in terms of the two most important emotional reactions after crime: anger and anxiety. It extends previous findings by showing that the debate concerning the effectiveness of delivering a VIS is not a ‘black and white’ matter. In this article, we argue that the question should not be whether delivering a VIS ‘works’ or ‘doesn’t work’ for the victim, but for whom, and under which conditions. We show that delivering a VIS does not give rise to direct ‘therapeutic’ effects. However, we found that feelings of anger and anxiety decrease for victims who experience more control over their recovery process and higher levels of procedural justice.

U2 - 10.1177/1477370814538778

DO - 10.1177/1477370814538778

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 17

EP - 34

JO - European Journal of Criminology

JF - European Journal of Criminology

SN - 1477-3708

IS - 1

ER -