Detecting and explaining aberrant responding on the Outcome Questionnaire-45

J.M. Conijn, W.H.M. Emons, K. de Jong, K. Sijtsma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We applied item response theory based person-fit analysis (PFA) to data of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) to investigate the prevalence and causes of aberrant responding in a sample of Dutch clinical outpatients. The Formula person-fit statistic was used to detect misfitting item-score patterns and the standardized residual statistic for identifying the source of the misfit in the item-score patterns identified as misfitting. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict person misfit from clinical diagnosis, OQ-45 total score, and Global Assessment of Functioning code. The Formula statistic classified 12.6% of the item-score patterns as misfitting. Person misfit was positively related to the severity of psychological distress. Furthermore, patients with psychotic disorders, somatoform disorders, or substance-related disorders more likely showed misfit than the baseline group of patients with mood and anxiety disorders. The results suggest that general outcome measures such as the OQ-45 are not equally appropriate for patients with different disorders. Our study emphasizes the importance of person-misfit detection in clinical practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-524
JournalAssessment
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Outpatients
Logistic Models
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Conijn, J. M., Emons, W. H. M., de Jong, K., & Sijtsma, K. (2015). Detecting and explaining aberrant responding on the Outcome Questionnaire-45. Assessment, 22(4), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114560882
Conijn, J.M. ; Emons, W.H.M. ; de Jong, K. ; Sijtsma, K. / Detecting and explaining aberrant responding on the Outcome Questionnaire-45. In: Assessment. 2015 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 513-524.
@article{f972a7f4b3dc40a98e94c141d3867942,
title = "Detecting and explaining aberrant responding on the Outcome Questionnaire-45",
abstract = "We applied item response theory based person-fit analysis (PFA) to data of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) to investigate the prevalence and causes of aberrant responding in a sample of Dutch clinical outpatients. The Formula person-fit statistic was used to detect misfitting item-score patterns and the standardized residual statistic for identifying the source of the misfit in the item-score patterns identified as misfitting. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict person misfit from clinical diagnosis, OQ-45 total score, and Global Assessment of Functioning code. The Formula statistic classified 12.6{\%} of the item-score patterns as misfitting. Person misfit was positively related to the severity of psychological distress. Furthermore, patients with psychotic disorders, somatoform disorders, or substance-related disorders more likely showed misfit than the baseline group of patients with mood and anxiety disorders. The results suggest that general outcome measures such as the OQ-45 are not equally appropriate for patients with different disorders. Our study emphasizes the importance of person-misfit detection in clinical practice.",
author = "J.M. Conijn and W.H.M. Emons and {de Jong}, K. and K. Sijtsma",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/1073191114560882",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "513--524",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Conijn, JM, Emons, WHM, de Jong, K & Sijtsma, K 2015, 'Detecting and explaining aberrant responding on the Outcome Questionnaire-45', Assessment, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114560882

Detecting and explaining aberrant responding on the Outcome Questionnaire-45. / Conijn, J.M.; Emons, W.H.M.; de Jong, K.; Sijtsma, K.

In: Assessment, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2015, p. 513-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting and explaining aberrant responding on the Outcome Questionnaire-45

AU - Conijn, J.M.

AU - Emons, W.H.M.

AU - de Jong, K.

AU - Sijtsma, K.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We applied item response theory based person-fit analysis (PFA) to data of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) to investigate the prevalence and causes of aberrant responding in a sample of Dutch clinical outpatients. The Formula person-fit statistic was used to detect misfitting item-score patterns and the standardized residual statistic for identifying the source of the misfit in the item-score patterns identified as misfitting. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict person misfit from clinical diagnosis, OQ-45 total score, and Global Assessment of Functioning code. The Formula statistic classified 12.6% of the item-score patterns as misfitting. Person misfit was positively related to the severity of psychological distress. Furthermore, patients with psychotic disorders, somatoform disorders, or substance-related disorders more likely showed misfit than the baseline group of patients with mood and anxiety disorders. The results suggest that general outcome measures such as the OQ-45 are not equally appropriate for patients with different disorders. Our study emphasizes the importance of person-misfit detection in clinical practice.

AB - We applied item response theory based person-fit analysis (PFA) to data of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) to investigate the prevalence and causes of aberrant responding in a sample of Dutch clinical outpatients. The Formula person-fit statistic was used to detect misfitting item-score patterns and the standardized residual statistic for identifying the source of the misfit in the item-score patterns identified as misfitting. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict person misfit from clinical diagnosis, OQ-45 total score, and Global Assessment of Functioning code. The Formula statistic classified 12.6% of the item-score patterns as misfitting. Person misfit was positively related to the severity of psychological distress. Furthermore, patients with psychotic disorders, somatoform disorders, or substance-related disorders more likely showed misfit than the baseline group of patients with mood and anxiety disorders. The results suggest that general outcome measures such as the OQ-45 are not equally appropriate for patients with different disorders. Our study emphasizes the importance of person-misfit detection in clinical practice.

U2 - 10.1177/1073191114560882

DO - 10.1177/1073191114560882

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 513

EP - 524

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 4

ER -