Detecting Deception In Spontaneous Versus Rehearsed Statements: Direct Deception Judgments for Rehearsed Truths Fall Short While Affective Character Judgments Endure

Marielle Stel; Ilja van Beest

doi:10.31235/osf.io/2w46u

Detecting Deception In Spontaneous Versus Rehearsed Statements: Direct Deception Judgments for Rehearsed Truths Fall Short While Affective Character Judgments Endure

Department of Social Psychology

Research output: Other contribution

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2w46u
Publication status	Published - 29 Oct 2017

Access to Document

10.31235/osf.io/2w46u

https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2w46u

Cite this

@misc{b2309627c14e4f6a98865601a008e145,

title = "Detecting Deception In Spontaneous Versus Rehearsed Statements: Direct Deception Judgments for Rehearsed Truths Fall Short While Affective Character Judgments Endure",

author = "Marielle Stel and Beest, {Ilja van}",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

day = "29",

doi = "10.31235/osf.io/2w46u",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Detecting Deception In Spontaneous Versus Rehearsed Statements: Direct Deception Judgments for Rehearsed Truths Fall Short While Affective Character Judgments Endure

AU - Stel, Marielle

AU - Beest, Ilja van

PY - 2017/10/29

Y1 - 2017/10/29

UR - https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2w46u

U2 - 10.31235/osf.io/2w46u

DO - 10.31235/osf.io/2w46u

M3 - Other contribution

ER -