Developing critical awareness: the consequences of action and reflection for perceptions of group injustices

Felicity Turner-Zwinkels, Tom Postmes, Martijn van Zomeren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Individuals often cannot address (objective) group injustices until they develop a (subjective) critical awareness of them. In three studies, we tested two potential psychological pathways toward critical awareness: Reflection (deductive, knowledge driven) and action (inductive, action driven) mindsets. Across studies, participants were exposed to an objectively unjust event, enacted by the experimenter. Based on a pilot study (N = 31) and first experiment (N = 28), we developed the hypothesis that action (vs. reflection) mindsets increase group entitativity (due to their reliance on expectancy effects), but not necessarily (subjective) critical awareness of (objective) group injustice. Study 2 (N = 121) confirmed this hypothesis. We discuss the difficulties of developing (subjective) critical awareness of (objective) group injustices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-157
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Developing critical awareness: the consequences of action and reflection for perceptions of group injustices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this