Diagnosing the misuse of the Bayes factor in applied research

J.N. Tendeiro*, H.A.L. Kiers, R Hoekstra, T.K. Wong, R.D. Morey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Hypothesis testing is often used for inference in the social sciences. In particular, null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and its p value have been ubiquitous in published research for decades. Much more recently, null hypothesis Bayesian testing (NHBT) and its Bayes factor have also started to become more commonplace in applied research. Following preliminary work by Wong and colleagues, we investigated how, and to what extent, researchers misapply the Bayes factor in applied psychological research by means of a literature study. Based on a final sample of 167 articles, our results indicate that, not unlike NHST and the p value, the use of NHBT and the Bayes factor also shows signs of misconceptions. We consider the root causes of the identified problems and provide suggestions to improve the current state of affairs. This article is aimed to assist researchers in drawing the best inferences possible while using NHBT and the Bayes factor in applied research.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalAdvances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Bayes factor
  • null hypothesis Bayesian testing
  • questionable reporting and interpreting practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosing the misuse of the Bayes factor in applied research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this