Differences in autonomic physiological responses between good and poor inductive reasoners

C.J. Melis, A. van Boxtel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We investigated individual- and task-related differences in autonomic physiological responses induced by time limited figural and verbal inductive reasoning tasks. In a group of 52 participants, the percentage of correctly responded task items was evaluated together with nine different autonomic physiological response measures and respiration rate (RR). Weighted multidimensional scaling analyses of the physiological responses revealed three underlying dimensions, primarily characterized by RR, parasympathetic, and sympathetic activity. RR and sympathetic activity appeared to be relatively more important response dimensions for poor reasoners, whereas parasympathetic responsivity was relatively more important for good reasoners. These results suggest that poor reasoners showed higher levels of cognitive processing intensity than good reasoners. Furthermore, for the good reasoners, the dimension of sympathetic activity was relatively more important during the figural than during the verbal reasoning task, which was explained in terms of hemispheric lateralization in autonomic function.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-146
JournalBiological Psychology
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Respiratory Rate

Cite this

@article{11c3699d252944989a317a12bc3aaa52,
title = "Differences in autonomic physiological responses between good and poor inductive reasoners",
abstract = "We investigated individual- and task-related differences in autonomic physiological responses induced by time limited figural and verbal inductive reasoning tasks. In a group of 52 participants, the percentage of correctly responded task items was evaluated together with nine different autonomic physiological response measures and respiration rate (RR). Weighted multidimensional scaling analyses of the physiological responses revealed three underlying dimensions, primarily characterized by RR, parasympathetic, and sympathetic activity. RR and sympathetic activity appeared to be relatively more important response dimensions for poor reasoners, whereas parasympathetic responsivity was relatively more important for good reasoners. These results suggest that poor reasoners showed higher levels of cognitive processing intensity than good reasoners. Furthermore, for the good reasoners, the dimension of sympathetic activity was relatively more important during the figural than during the verbal reasoning task, which was explained in terms of hemispheric lateralization in autonomic function.",
author = "C.J. Melis and {van Boxtel}, A.",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00112-0",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "121--146",
journal = "Biological Psychology",
issn = "0301-0511",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",
number = "2",

}

Differences in autonomic physiological responses between good and poor inductive reasoners. / Melis, C.J.; van Boxtel, A.

In: Biological Psychology, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2001, p. 121-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in autonomic physiological responses between good and poor inductive reasoners

AU - Melis, C.J.

AU - van Boxtel, A.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We investigated individual- and task-related differences in autonomic physiological responses induced by time limited figural and verbal inductive reasoning tasks. In a group of 52 participants, the percentage of correctly responded task items was evaluated together with nine different autonomic physiological response measures and respiration rate (RR). Weighted multidimensional scaling analyses of the physiological responses revealed three underlying dimensions, primarily characterized by RR, parasympathetic, and sympathetic activity. RR and sympathetic activity appeared to be relatively more important response dimensions for poor reasoners, whereas parasympathetic responsivity was relatively more important for good reasoners. These results suggest that poor reasoners showed higher levels of cognitive processing intensity than good reasoners. Furthermore, for the good reasoners, the dimension of sympathetic activity was relatively more important during the figural than during the verbal reasoning task, which was explained in terms of hemispheric lateralization in autonomic function.

AB - We investigated individual- and task-related differences in autonomic physiological responses induced by time limited figural and verbal inductive reasoning tasks. In a group of 52 participants, the percentage of correctly responded task items was evaluated together with nine different autonomic physiological response measures and respiration rate (RR). Weighted multidimensional scaling analyses of the physiological responses revealed three underlying dimensions, primarily characterized by RR, parasympathetic, and sympathetic activity. RR and sympathetic activity appeared to be relatively more important response dimensions for poor reasoners, whereas parasympathetic responsivity was relatively more important for good reasoners. These results suggest that poor reasoners showed higher levels of cognitive processing intensity than good reasoners. Furthermore, for the good reasoners, the dimension of sympathetic activity was relatively more important during the figural than during the verbal reasoning task, which was explained in terms of hemispheric lateralization in autonomic function.

U2 - 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00112-0

DO - 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00112-0

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 121

EP - 146

JO - Biological Psychology

JF - Biological Psychology

SN - 0301-0511

IS - 2

ER -