Differences in patient outcomes and chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy: An explorative study

H.W. Drewes, M. Lambooij, C.A. Baan, B.R. Meijboom, W.C. Graafmans, G.P. Westert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Background The oral anticoagulant therapy - provided to prevent thrombosis - is known to be associated with substantial avoidable hospitalization. Improving the quality of the oral anticoagulant therapy could avoid drug related hospitalizations. Therefore, this study compared the patient outcomes between Dutch anticoagulant clinic (AC) regions taking the variation in chronic care management into account in order to explore whether chronic care management elements could improve the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy. Methods Two data sources were combined. The first source was a questionnaire that was send to all ACs in the Netherlands in 2008 (response = 100%) to identify the application of chronic care management elements in the AC regions. The Chronic Care Model of Wagner was used to make the concept of chronic care management operational. The second source was the report of the Dutch National Network of ACs which contains patient outcomes of the ACs. Results Patient outcomes achieved by the ACs were good, yet differences existed; for instance the percentage of patients in the appropriate therapeutic ranges varied from 67 to 87% between AC regions. Moreover, differences existed in the use of chronic care management elements of the chronic care model, for example 12% of the ACs had multidisciplinary meetings and 58% of the ACs had formal agreements with at least one hospital within their region. Patient outcomes were significantly associated with patient orientation and the number of specialized nurses versus doctors (p-values < 0.05). Furthermore, the overall extent to which chronic care management elements were applied was positively associated with patient outcomes (p-values < 0.05). Conclusions Substantial differences in the patient outcomes as well as chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy existed. Since our results showed a positive association between overall application of chronic care management and patient outcomes, additional research is needed to fully understand the working mechanism of chronic care management.
Original languageEnglish
Article number18
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Patient Care Management
Information Storage and Retrieval
Netherlands
Nurses
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Drewes, H.W. ; Lambooij, M. ; Baan, C.A. ; Meijboom, B.R. ; Graafmans, W.C. ; Westert, G.P. / Differences in patient outcomes and chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy : An explorative study. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2011 ; Vol. 11, No. 1.
@article{dd5e61447c4b42f1911ee54a4ebbf124,
title = "Differences in patient outcomes and chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy: An explorative study",
abstract = "Background The oral anticoagulant therapy - provided to prevent thrombosis - is known to be associated with substantial avoidable hospitalization. Improving the quality of the oral anticoagulant therapy could avoid drug related hospitalizations. Therefore, this study compared the patient outcomes between Dutch anticoagulant clinic (AC) regions taking the variation in chronic care management into account in order to explore whether chronic care management elements could improve the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy. Methods Two data sources were combined. The first source was a questionnaire that was send to all ACs in the Netherlands in 2008 (response = 100{\%}) to identify the application of chronic care management elements in the AC regions. The Chronic Care Model of Wagner was used to make the concept of chronic care management operational. The second source was the report of the Dutch National Network of ACs which contains patient outcomes of the ACs. Results Patient outcomes achieved by the ACs were good, yet differences existed; for instance the percentage of patients in the appropriate therapeutic ranges varied from 67 to 87{\%} between AC regions. Moreover, differences existed in the use of chronic care management elements of the chronic care model, for example 12{\%} of the ACs had multidisciplinary meetings and 58{\%} of the ACs had formal agreements with at least one hospital within their region. Patient outcomes were significantly associated with patient orientation and the number of specialized nurses versus doctors (p-values < 0.05). Furthermore, the overall extent to which chronic care management elements were applied was positively associated with patient outcomes (p-values < 0.05). Conclusions Substantial differences in the patient outcomes as well as chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy existed. Since our results showed a positive association between overall application of chronic care management and patient outcomes, additional research is needed to fully understand the working mechanism of chronic care management.",
author = "H.W. Drewes and M. Lambooij and C.A. Baan and B.R. Meijboom and W.C. Graafmans and G.P. Westert",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-11-18",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BMC",
number = "1",

}

Differences in patient outcomes and chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy : An explorative study. / Drewes, H.W.; Lambooij, M.; Baan, C.A.; Meijboom, B.R.; Graafmans, W.C.; Westert, G.P.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, 18, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in patient outcomes and chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy

T2 - An explorative study

AU - Drewes, H.W.

AU - Lambooij, M.

AU - Baan, C.A.

AU - Meijboom, B.R.

AU - Graafmans, W.C.

AU - Westert, G.P.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background The oral anticoagulant therapy - provided to prevent thrombosis - is known to be associated with substantial avoidable hospitalization. Improving the quality of the oral anticoagulant therapy could avoid drug related hospitalizations. Therefore, this study compared the patient outcomes between Dutch anticoagulant clinic (AC) regions taking the variation in chronic care management into account in order to explore whether chronic care management elements could improve the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy. Methods Two data sources were combined. The first source was a questionnaire that was send to all ACs in the Netherlands in 2008 (response = 100%) to identify the application of chronic care management elements in the AC regions. The Chronic Care Model of Wagner was used to make the concept of chronic care management operational. The second source was the report of the Dutch National Network of ACs which contains patient outcomes of the ACs. Results Patient outcomes achieved by the ACs were good, yet differences existed; for instance the percentage of patients in the appropriate therapeutic ranges varied from 67 to 87% between AC regions. Moreover, differences existed in the use of chronic care management elements of the chronic care model, for example 12% of the ACs had multidisciplinary meetings and 58% of the ACs had formal agreements with at least one hospital within their region. Patient outcomes were significantly associated with patient orientation and the number of specialized nurses versus doctors (p-values < 0.05). Furthermore, the overall extent to which chronic care management elements were applied was positively associated with patient outcomes (p-values < 0.05). Conclusions Substantial differences in the patient outcomes as well as chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy existed. Since our results showed a positive association between overall application of chronic care management and patient outcomes, additional research is needed to fully understand the working mechanism of chronic care management.

AB - Background The oral anticoagulant therapy - provided to prevent thrombosis - is known to be associated with substantial avoidable hospitalization. Improving the quality of the oral anticoagulant therapy could avoid drug related hospitalizations. Therefore, this study compared the patient outcomes between Dutch anticoagulant clinic (AC) regions taking the variation in chronic care management into account in order to explore whether chronic care management elements could improve the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy. Methods Two data sources were combined. The first source was a questionnaire that was send to all ACs in the Netherlands in 2008 (response = 100%) to identify the application of chronic care management elements in the AC regions. The Chronic Care Model of Wagner was used to make the concept of chronic care management operational. The second source was the report of the Dutch National Network of ACs which contains patient outcomes of the ACs. Results Patient outcomes achieved by the ACs were good, yet differences existed; for instance the percentage of patients in the appropriate therapeutic ranges varied from 67 to 87% between AC regions. Moreover, differences existed in the use of chronic care management elements of the chronic care model, for example 12% of the ACs had multidisciplinary meetings and 58% of the ACs had formal agreements with at least one hospital within their region. Patient outcomes were significantly associated with patient orientation and the number of specialized nurses versus doctors (p-values < 0.05). Furthermore, the overall extent to which chronic care management elements were applied was positively associated with patient outcomes (p-values < 0.05). Conclusions Substantial differences in the patient outcomes as well as chronic care management of oral anticoagulant therapy existed. Since our results showed a positive association between overall application of chronic care management and patient outcomes, additional research is needed to fully understand the working mechanism of chronic care management.

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-11-18

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-11-18

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 18

ER -