Abstract
Online discussions can fuel perceptions of misalignment, disagreement, conflict or even polarization. In this study, we look at everyday diplomatic expressions that could buffer this. We use automated and manual coding to analyze diplomatic behaviour in online discussions and its consequences for discussion sentiment. We analyze Reddit forums with differing norms: civil (N = 4594 comments), incivil (N = 2126) and social support subreddits (N = 1401). The automated content analysis shows that diplomatic behaviour occurs but does not affect the subsequent discussion. The manual analysis reveals why: discussions consist of disjointed statements rather than dialogue, making diplomacy inconsequential. These results have consequences for the field. First, what appears to be an escalating dialogue might actually be a string of personal attitudes broadcasted in a shared space. Second, the usefulness of automated content analysis in studying interaction dynamics is limited because of difficulties distinguishing broadcasting from dialogue.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 314-331 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | European Journal of Social Psychology |
Early online date | Nov 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - Nov 2023 |
Keywords
- automated content analysis
- broadcasting
- dialogue
- diplomacy
- manual analysis
- online discussion
- online polarization
- social media
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Diplomacy online: A case of mistaking broadcasting for dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Anonymized Data and Analysis Code for: Diplomacy Online: A Case of Mistaking Broadcasting for Dialogue
Roos, C. (Creator), Utz, S. (Creator), Koudenburg, N. (Creator) & Postmes, T. (Creator), DataverseNL, 22 Nov 2023
DOI: 10.34894/kke3fr, https://dataverse.nl/citation?persistentId=doi:10.34894/KKE3FR
Dataset