Direct and mediated ties to universities

“Scientific” absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms

R. Belderbos, Victor Gilsing, S. Suzuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Extant literature on firm–university collaboration has emphasized two different strategies that firms in science-based industries adopt to source scientific knowledge and expertise. On one hand, firms engage in direct research collaborations with universities. On the other hand, firms establish indirect, mediated, ties to universities by engaging in research collaborations with dedicated biotech firms that are themselves strongly linked to universities—with the dedicated biotech firm taking the role of “broker.” We argue that the relative benefits of direct and mediated ties depend on the extent to which firms have organized their research and development to facilitate the absorption, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation of scientific knowledge, which we coin “scientific absorptive capacity.” Drawing on patent and publication data in a panel of 33 vertically integrated pharmaceutical firms, we find that direct university collaboration is more beneficial for firms with relatively high scientific absorptive capacity, while only mediated ties are associated with greater innovative performance for firms with relatively low scientific absorptive capacity. The latter association is reduced if the mediated ties are with top universities. Our findings are suggestive of the importance of a “fit” between the nature of a firm’s research and development organization and its strategy to access scientific knowledge. Keywords: alliance portfolios, industry–science linkages, R&D collaboration, scientific absorptive capacity
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-52
JournalStrategic Organization
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

pharmaceutical
innovation
firm
university
performance
research and development
Pharmaceuticals
Innovation performance
Absorptive capacity
knowledge
assimilation
patent
exploitation
expertise
organization
industry
science
Scientific knowledge

Cite this

@article{44ada791e38f47659aab564c94fdf90b,
title = "Direct and mediated ties to universities: “Scientific” absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms",
abstract = "Extant literature on firm–university collaboration has emphasized two different strategies that firms in science-based industries adopt to source scientific knowledge and expertise. On one hand, firms engage in direct research collaborations with universities. On the other hand, firms establish indirect, mediated, ties to universities by engaging in research collaborations with dedicated biotech firms that are themselves strongly linked to universities—with the dedicated biotech firm taking the role of “broker.” We argue that the relative benefits of direct and mediated ties depend on the extent to which firms have organized their research and development to facilitate the absorption, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation of scientific knowledge, which we coin “scientific absorptive capacity.” Drawing on patent and publication data in a panel of 33 vertically integrated pharmaceutical firms, we find that direct university collaboration is more beneficial for firms with relatively high scientific absorptive capacity, while only mediated ties are associated with greater innovative performance for firms with relatively low scientific absorptive capacity. The latter association is reduced if the mediated ties are with top universities. Our findings are suggestive of the importance of a “fit” between the nature of a firm’s research and development organization and its strategy to access scientific knowledge. Keywords: alliance portfolios, industry–science linkages, R&D collaboration, scientific absorptive capacity",
author = "R. Belderbos and Victor Gilsing and S. Suzuki",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1476127015604734",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "32--52",
journal = "Strategic Organization",
issn = "1476-1270",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Direct and mediated ties to universities : “Scientific” absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms. / Belderbos, R.; Gilsing, Victor; Suzuki, S.

In: Strategic Organization, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2016, p. 32-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct and mediated ties to universities

T2 - “Scientific” absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms

AU - Belderbos, R.

AU - Gilsing, Victor

AU - Suzuki, S.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Extant literature on firm–university collaboration has emphasized two different strategies that firms in science-based industries adopt to source scientific knowledge and expertise. On one hand, firms engage in direct research collaborations with universities. On the other hand, firms establish indirect, mediated, ties to universities by engaging in research collaborations with dedicated biotech firms that are themselves strongly linked to universities—with the dedicated biotech firm taking the role of “broker.” We argue that the relative benefits of direct and mediated ties depend on the extent to which firms have organized their research and development to facilitate the absorption, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation of scientific knowledge, which we coin “scientific absorptive capacity.” Drawing on patent and publication data in a panel of 33 vertically integrated pharmaceutical firms, we find that direct university collaboration is more beneficial for firms with relatively high scientific absorptive capacity, while only mediated ties are associated with greater innovative performance for firms with relatively low scientific absorptive capacity. The latter association is reduced if the mediated ties are with top universities. Our findings are suggestive of the importance of a “fit” between the nature of a firm’s research and development organization and its strategy to access scientific knowledge. Keywords: alliance portfolios, industry–science linkages, R&D collaboration, scientific absorptive capacity

AB - Extant literature on firm–university collaboration has emphasized two different strategies that firms in science-based industries adopt to source scientific knowledge and expertise. On one hand, firms engage in direct research collaborations with universities. On the other hand, firms establish indirect, mediated, ties to universities by engaging in research collaborations with dedicated biotech firms that are themselves strongly linked to universities—with the dedicated biotech firm taking the role of “broker.” We argue that the relative benefits of direct and mediated ties depend on the extent to which firms have organized their research and development to facilitate the absorption, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation of scientific knowledge, which we coin “scientific absorptive capacity.” Drawing on patent and publication data in a panel of 33 vertically integrated pharmaceutical firms, we find that direct university collaboration is more beneficial for firms with relatively high scientific absorptive capacity, while only mediated ties are associated with greater innovative performance for firms with relatively low scientific absorptive capacity. The latter association is reduced if the mediated ties are with top universities. Our findings are suggestive of the importance of a “fit” between the nature of a firm’s research and development organization and its strategy to access scientific knowledge. Keywords: alliance portfolios, industry–science linkages, R&D collaboration, scientific absorptive capacity

U2 - 10.1177/1476127015604734

DO - 10.1177/1476127015604734

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 32

EP - 52

JO - Strategic Organization

JF - Strategic Organization

SN - 1476-1270

IS - 1

ER -