Disagreement and Learning About Reforms

J. Binswanger, M. Oechslin

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

645 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract: When it comes to economic reforms in developing countries, many economists agree on broad objectives (such as fostering outward orientation). Broad objectives, however, can be pursued in many di¤erent ways, and policy experimentation is often indispensable for learning which alternative works locally. We propose a simple model to study this societal learning process. The model explores the role of disagreeing beliefs about “what works”. It suggests that this type of disagreement can stall the societal learning process and cause economic stagnation. Interestingly, this can happen even if everybody knows that Pareto-improving reforms do exist. Our analysis is motivated by the empirical observation of a negative relationship between disagreement and economic growth among poorer countries.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherEconomics
Number of pages38
Volume2014-020
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2014-020

Fingerprint

Learning process
Economic reform
Experimentation
Developing countries
Pareto
Economics
Economic growth
Stagnation
Economists

Keywords

  • Disagreement
  • experimentation
  • societal learning
  • development policy
  • gridlock

Cite this

Binswanger, J., & Oechslin, M. (2014). Disagreement and Learning About Reforms. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2014-020). Tilburg: Economics.
Binswanger, J. ; Oechslin, M. / Disagreement and Learning About Reforms. Tilburg : Economics, 2014. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{bb4785e974c346ffbdabd3a3a5687396,
title = "Disagreement and Learning About Reforms",
abstract = "Abstract: When it comes to economic reforms in developing countries, many economists agree on broad objectives (such as fostering outward orientation). Broad objectives, however, can be pursued in many di¤erent ways, and policy experimentation is often indispensable for learning which alternative works locally. We propose a simple model to study this societal learning process. The model explores the role of disagreeing beliefs about “what works”. It suggests that this type of disagreement can stall the societal learning process and cause economic stagnation. Interestingly, this can happen even if everybody knows that Pareto-improving reforms do exist. Our analysis is motivated by the empirical observation of a negative relationship between disagreement and economic growth among poorer countries.",
keywords = "Disagreement, experimentation, societal learning, development policy, gridlock",
author = "J. Binswanger and M. Oechslin",
note = "Pagination: 38",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "2014-020",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Economics",

}

Binswanger, J & Oechslin, M 2014 'Disagreement and Learning About Reforms' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2014-020, Economics, Tilburg.

Disagreement and Learning About Reforms. / Binswanger, J.; Oechslin, M.

Tilburg : Economics, 2014. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2014-020).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Disagreement and Learning About Reforms

AU - Binswanger, J.

AU - Oechslin, M.

N1 - Pagination: 38

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Abstract: When it comes to economic reforms in developing countries, many economists agree on broad objectives (such as fostering outward orientation). Broad objectives, however, can be pursued in many di¤erent ways, and policy experimentation is often indispensable for learning which alternative works locally. We propose a simple model to study this societal learning process. The model explores the role of disagreeing beliefs about “what works”. It suggests that this type of disagreement can stall the societal learning process and cause economic stagnation. Interestingly, this can happen even if everybody knows that Pareto-improving reforms do exist. Our analysis is motivated by the empirical observation of a negative relationship between disagreement and economic growth among poorer countries.

AB - Abstract: When it comes to economic reforms in developing countries, many economists agree on broad objectives (such as fostering outward orientation). Broad objectives, however, can be pursued in many di¤erent ways, and policy experimentation is often indispensable for learning which alternative works locally. We propose a simple model to study this societal learning process. The model explores the role of disagreeing beliefs about “what works”. It suggests that this type of disagreement can stall the societal learning process and cause economic stagnation. Interestingly, this can happen even if everybody knows that Pareto-improving reforms do exist. Our analysis is motivated by the empirical observation of a negative relationship between disagreement and economic growth among poorer countries.

KW - Disagreement

KW - experimentation

KW - societal learning

KW - development policy

KW - gridlock

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2014-020

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Disagreement and Learning About Reforms

PB - Economics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Binswanger J, Oechslin M. Disagreement and Learning About Reforms. Tilburg: Economics. 2014. (CentER Discussion Paper).