Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota

H.R. Krikke, R. Zuidwijk

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

247 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper addresses the impact of disposition choices on the energy use of closed-loop supply chains. In a life cycle perspective, energy used in the forward chain which is locked up in the product is recaptured in recovery. High quality recovery replaces virgin production and thereby saves energy. This so called substitution effect is often ignored. Governments worldwide implement Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). Policies are based on recovery quota and not effective from an energy point of view. This in turn leads to unnecessary emissions of amongst others CO2. This research evaluates current EPR policies and presents six policy alternatives from an energy standpoint. The Pareto-frontier model used is generic and can be applied to other closed loops supply chains under EPR, exploiting the substitution effect. The measures modeled are applied to five WEEE cases. We discuss results, pros an cons of various alternatives and complementary measures that might be taken.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherOrganization
Number of pages37
Volume2008-74
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2008-74

Fingerprint

Recovery
Supply chains
Substitution reactions
Life cycle

Keywords

  • extended producer responsibility
  • disposition
  • energy perspective
  • substitution effect
  • government policies
  • Pareto efficiency

Cite this

Krikke, H. R., & Zuidwijk, R. (2008). Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2008-74). Tilburg: Organization.
Krikke, H.R. ; Zuidwijk, R. / Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota. Tilburg : Organization, 2008. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{e8654e2a9cf24d88aa832f358dfe292d,
title = "Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota",
abstract = "This paper addresses the impact of disposition choices on the energy use of closed-loop supply chains. In a life cycle perspective, energy used in the forward chain which is locked up in the product is recaptured in recovery. High quality recovery replaces virgin production and thereby saves energy. This so called substitution effect is often ignored. Governments worldwide implement Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). Policies are based on recovery quota and not effective from an energy point of view. This in turn leads to unnecessary emissions of amongst others CO2. This research evaluates current EPR policies and presents six policy alternatives from an energy standpoint. The Pareto-frontier model used is generic and can be applied to other closed loops supply chains under EPR, exploiting the substitution effect. The measures modeled are applied to five WEEE cases. We discuss results, pros an cons of various alternatives and complementary measures that might be taken.",
keywords = "extended producer responsibility, disposition, energy perspective, substitution effect, government policies, Pareto efficiency",
author = "H.R. Krikke and R. Zuidwijk",
note = "Pagination: 37",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "2008-74",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Organization",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Organization",

}

Krikke, HR & Zuidwijk, R 2008 'Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2008-74, Organization, Tilburg.

Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota. / Krikke, H.R.; Zuidwijk, R.

Tilburg : Organization, 2008. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2008-74).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota

AU - Krikke, H.R.

AU - Zuidwijk, R.

N1 - Pagination: 37

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This paper addresses the impact of disposition choices on the energy use of closed-loop supply chains. In a life cycle perspective, energy used in the forward chain which is locked up in the product is recaptured in recovery. High quality recovery replaces virgin production and thereby saves energy. This so called substitution effect is often ignored. Governments worldwide implement Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). Policies are based on recovery quota and not effective from an energy point of view. This in turn leads to unnecessary emissions of amongst others CO2. This research evaluates current EPR policies and presents six policy alternatives from an energy standpoint. The Pareto-frontier model used is generic and can be applied to other closed loops supply chains under EPR, exploiting the substitution effect. The measures modeled are applied to five WEEE cases. We discuss results, pros an cons of various alternatives and complementary measures that might be taken.

AB - This paper addresses the impact of disposition choices on the energy use of closed-loop supply chains. In a life cycle perspective, energy used in the forward chain which is locked up in the product is recaptured in recovery. High quality recovery replaces virgin production and thereby saves energy. This so called substitution effect is often ignored. Governments worldwide implement Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). Policies are based on recovery quota and not effective from an energy point of view. This in turn leads to unnecessary emissions of amongst others CO2. This research evaluates current EPR policies and presents six policy alternatives from an energy standpoint. The Pareto-frontier model used is generic and can be applied to other closed loops supply chains under EPR, exploiting the substitution effect. The measures modeled are applied to five WEEE cases. We discuss results, pros an cons of various alternatives and complementary measures that might be taken.

KW - extended producer responsibility

KW - disposition

KW - energy perspective

KW - substitution effect

KW - government policies

KW - Pareto efficiency

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2008-74

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota

PB - Organization

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Krikke HR, Zuidwijk R. Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota. Tilburg: Organization. 2008. (CentER Discussion Paper).