Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota

H.R. Krikke, R. Zuidwijk

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

282 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper addresses the impact of disposition choices on the energy use of closed-loop supply chains. In a life cycle perspective, energy used in the forward chain which is locked up in the product is recaptured in recovery. High quality recovery replaces virgin production and thereby saves energy. This so called substitution effect is often ignored. Governments worldwide implement Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). Policies are based on recovery quota and not effective from an energy point of view. This in turn leads to unnecessary emissions of amongst others CO2. This research evaluates current EPR policies and presents six policy alternatives from an energy standpoint. The Pareto-frontier model used is generic and can be applied to other closed loops supply chains under EPR, exploiting the substitution effect. The measures modeled are applied to five WEEE cases. We discuss results, pros an cons of various alternatives and complementary measures that might be taken.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherOrganization
Number of pages37
Volume2008-74
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2008-74

Keywords

  • extended producer responsibility
  • disposition
  • energy perspective
  • substitution effect
  • government policies
  • Pareto efficiency

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Krikke, H. R., & Zuidwijk, R. (2008). Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2008-74). Organization.