Do Europe’s Product Labels Converge? The Case of EU Ecolabel, EU Energy and CE Marking

M. Cetik

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

    Abstract

    Not only ecolabelling and energy labeling but also its wider framework, namely, the idea of sustainable consumption and production are recent issues of the globe compared to consumer product safety which dates back to the 19th century. Previous studies analyze the regulation of ecolabelling and energy labeling neglecting its common aspects with product labeling for human health and safety purposes. This article focuses on the development of those three types of product labels, namely, CE Marking, EU Energy Label and EU Ecolabel employed in the European Union (EU) also with a view to predict their future. It is revealed that increasing societal awareness in ecological issues tend to converge earlier measures of product safety labelling (CE Marking) into new measures of ecolabelling (EU Ecolabel) in terms of substance. Secondly, the Article shows that both EU Energy Label and EU Ecolabel tend to converge into CE Marking particularly in terms of standardisation procedures as well as conformity assessment, market surveillance and enforcement. Interestingly, convergence tends to occur in both directions regarding the substance and standardisation of EU Ecolabel vis-à-vis CE Marking. In the end, it is suggested that EU Ecolabel may (and perhaps should) become mandatory in the future in view of the historical development and justifications regarding mandatory CE Marking and EU Energy Label. On the other hand, a mandatory federal ecolabel does not seem so likely in case of the United States (US) due to its different attitude towards product labeling as well as consumers’ impact on the environment. Nevertheless, some procedural convergence is visible among product labels.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationTilburg
    PublisherTILEC
    Volume2011-048
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Publication series

    NameTILEC Discussion Paper
    Volume2011-048

    Fingerprint

    energy
    historical development
    conformity
    surveillance
    regulation
    market
    health

    Keywords

    • ecolabel
    • energy label
    • free movement of goods
    • CE Marking

    Cite this

    Cetik, M. (2011). Do Europe’s Product Labels Converge? The Case of EU Ecolabel, EU Energy and CE Marking. (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2011-048). Tilburg: TILEC.
    Cetik, M. / Do Europe’s Product Labels Converge? The Case of EU Ecolabel, EU Energy and CE Marking. Tilburg : TILEC, 2011. (TILEC Discussion Paper).
    @techreport{94f2d029a29e40e9a24537af869c73aa,
    title = "Do Europe’s Product Labels Converge? The Case of EU Ecolabel, EU Energy and CE Marking",
    abstract = "Not only ecolabelling and energy labeling but also its wider framework, namely, the idea of sustainable consumption and production are recent issues of the globe compared to consumer product safety which dates back to the 19th century. Previous studies analyze the regulation of ecolabelling and energy labeling neglecting its common aspects with product labeling for human health and safety purposes. This article focuses on the development of those three types of product labels, namely, CE Marking, EU Energy Label and EU Ecolabel employed in the European Union (EU) also with a view to predict their future. It is revealed that increasing societal awareness in ecological issues tend to converge earlier measures of product safety labelling (CE Marking) into new measures of ecolabelling (EU Ecolabel) in terms of substance. Secondly, the Article shows that both EU Energy Label and EU Ecolabel tend to converge into CE Marking particularly in terms of standardisation procedures as well as conformity assessment, market surveillance and enforcement. Interestingly, convergence tends to occur in both directions regarding the substance and standardisation of EU Ecolabel vis-{\`a}-vis CE Marking. In the end, it is suggested that EU Ecolabel may (and perhaps should) become mandatory in the future in view of the historical development and justifications regarding mandatory CE Marking and EU Energy Label. On the other hand, a mandatory federal ecolabel does not seem so likely in case of the United States (US) due to its different attitude towards product labeling as well as consumers’ impact on the environment. Nevertheless, some procedural convergence is visible among product labels.",
    keywords = "ecolabel, energy label, free movement of goods, CE Marking",
    author = "M. Cetik",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2011-048",
    series = "TILEC Discussion Paper",
    publisher = "TILEC",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "TILEC",

    }

    Cetik, M 2011 'Do Europe’s Product Labels Converge? The Case of EU Ecolabel, EU Energy and CE Marking' TILEC Discussion Paper, vol. 2011-048, TILEC, Tilburg.

    Do Europe’s Product Labels Converge? The Case of EU Ecolabel, EU Energy and CE Marking. / Cetik, M.

    Tilburg : TILEC, 2011. (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2011-048).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Do Europe’s Product Labels Converge? The Case of EU Ecolabel, EU Energy and CE Marking

    AU - Cetik, M.

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Not only ecolabelling and energy labeling but also its wider framework, namely, the idea of sustainable consumption and production are recent issues of the globe compared to consumer product safety which dates back to the 19th century. Previous studies analyze the regulation of ecolabelling and energy labeling neglecting its common aspects with product labeling for human health and safety purposes. This article focuses on the development of those three types of product labels, namely, CE Marking, EU Energy Label and EU Ecolabel employed in the European Union (EU) also with a view to predict their future. It is revealed that increasing societal awareness in ecological issues tend to converge earlier measures of product safety labelling (CE Marking) into new measures of ecolabelling (EU Ecolabel) in terms of substance. Secondly, the Article shows that both EU Energy Label and EU Ecolabel tend to converge into CE Marking particularly in terms of standardisation procedures as well as conformity assessment, market surveillance and enforcement. Interestingly, convergence tends to occur in both directions regarding the substance and standardisation of EU Ecolabel vis-à-vis CE Marking. In the end, it is suggested that EU Ecolabel may (and perhaps should) become mandatory in the future in view of the historical development and justifications regarding mandatory CE Marking and EU Energy Label. On the other hand, a mandatory federal ecolabel does not seem so likely in case of the United States (US) due to its different attitude towards product labeling as well as consumers’ impact on the environment. Nevertheless, some procedural convergence is visible among product labels.

    AB - Not only ecolabelling and energy labeling but also its wider framework, namely, the idea of sustainable consumption and production are recent issues of the globe compared to consumer product safety which dates back to the 19th century. Previous studies analyze the regulation of ecolabelling and energy labeling neglecting its common aspects with product labeling for human health and safety purposes. This article focuses on the development of those three types of product labels, namely, CE Marking, EU Energy Label and EU Ecolabel employed in the European Union (EU) also with a view to predict their future. It is revealed that increasing societal awareness in ecological issues tend to converge earlier measures of product safety labelling (CE Marking) into new measures of ecolabelling (EU Ecolabel) in terms of substance. Secondly, the Article shows that both EU Energy Label and EU Ecolabel tend to converge into CE Marking particularly in terms of standardisation procedures as well as conformity assessment, market surveillance and enforcement. Interestingly, convergence tends to occur in both directions regarding the substance and standardisation of EU Ecolabel vis-à-vis CE Marking. In the end, it is suggested that EU Ecolabel may (and perhaps should) become mandatory in the future in view of the historical development and justifications regarding mandatory CE Marking and EU Energy Label. On the other hand, a mandatory federal ecolabel does not seem so likely in case of the United States (US) due to its different attitude towards product labeling as well as consumers’ impact on the environment. Nevertheless, some procedural convergence is visible among product labels.

    KW - ecolabel

    KW - energy label

    KW - free movement of goods

    KW - CE Marking

    M3 - Discussion paper

    VL - 2011-048

    T3 - TILEC Discussion Paper

    BT - Do Europe’s Product Labels Converge? The Case of EU Ecolabel, EU Energy and CE Marking

    PB - TILEC

    CY - Tilburg

    ER -