Do housing regimes matter?

Assessing the concept of housing regimes through configurations of housing outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Based on a conceptualisation of de-commodification as the right to decent and affordable housing, we assessed to what extent this right is realised for low-to-moderate-income owners and renters across Western European housing regimes in 1995 and 2012. If differences in the social production of housing do matter (regardless of type of welfare state and the country's economic affluence), then distinct configurations of housing outcomes should exist. This was found to be indeed the case: More state intervention results in good housing conditions and low housing cost burdens across tenure-age groups (but particularly for renters), although more so in social-democratic than in conservative-corporatist welfare states. A more important role for the family in housing provision is associated with higher subjective housing cost burdens and poor housing conditions. As housing regimes became more commodified between 1995 and 2012, it seems that configurations of housing outcomes have become less associated with the features of housing regimes, and more with type of welfare state and the country's economic affluence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-404
JournalInternational Journal of Social Welfare
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

housing
regime
welfare state
housing conditions
affluence
costs
economics
age group
income

Cite this

@article{7a216d3d0d014c0f830f9eeb17ae2c46,
title = "Do housing regimes matter?: Assessing the concept of housing regimes through configurations of housing outcomes",
abstract = "Based on a conceptualisation of de-commodification as the right to decent and affordable housing, we assessed to what extent this right is realised for low-to-moderate-income owners and renters across Western European housing regimes in 1995 and 2012. If differences in the social production of housing do matter (regardless of type of welfare state and the country's economic affluence), then distinct configurations of housing outcomes should exist. This was found to be indeed the case: More state intervention results in good housing conditions and low housing cost burdens across tenure-age groups (but particularly for renters), although more so in social-democratic than in conservative-corporatist welfare states. A more important role for the family in housing provision is associated with higher subjective housing cost burdens and poor housing conditions. As housing regimes became more commodified between 1995 and 2012, it seems that configurations of housing outcomes have become less associated with the features of housing regimes, and more with type of welfare state and the country's economic affluence.",
author = "C.L. Dewilde",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/ijsw.12261",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "384--404",
journal = "International Journal of Social Welfare",
issn = "1369-6866",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Do housing regimes matter? Assessing the concept of housing regimes through configurations of housing outcomes. / Dewilde, C.L.

In: International Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2017, p. 384-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do housing regimes matter?

T2 - Assessing the concept of housing regimes through configurations of housing outcomes

AU - Dewilde, C.L.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Based on a conceptualisation of de-commodification as the right to decent and affordable housing, we assessed to what extent this right is realised for low-to-moderate-income owners and renters across Western European housing regimes in 1995 and 2012. If differences in the social production of housing do matter (regardless of type of welfare state and the country's economic affluence), then distinct configurations of housing outcomes should exist. This was found to be indeed the case: More state intervention results in good housing conditions and low housing cost burdens across tenure-age groups (but particularly for renters), although more so in social-democratic than in conservative-corporatist welfare states. A more important role for the family in housing provision is associated with higher subjective housing cost burdens and poor housing conditions. As housing regimes became more commodified between 1995 and 2012, it seems that configurations of housing outcomes have become less associated with the features of housing regimes, and more with type of welfare state and the country's economic affluence.

AB - Based on a conceptualisation of de-commodification as the right to decent and affordable housing, we assessed to what extent this right is realised for low-to-moderate-income owners and renters across Western European housing regimes in 1995 and 2012. If differences in the social production of housing do matter (regardless of type of welfare state and the country's economic affluence), then distinct configurations of housing outcomes should exist. This was found to be indeed the case: More state intervention results in good housing conditions and low housing cost burdens across tenure-age groups (but particularly for renters), although more so in social-democratic than in conservative-corporatist welfare states. A more important role for the family in housing provision is associated with higher subjective housing cost burdens and poor housing conditions. As housing regimes became more commodified between 1995 and 2012, it seems that configurations of housing outcomes have become less associated with the features of housing regimes, and more with type of welfare state and the country's economic affluence.

U2 - 10.1111/ijsw.12261

DO - 10.1111/ijsw.12261

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 384

EP - 404

JO - International Journal of Social Welfare

JF - International Journal of Social Welfare

SN - 1369-6866

IS - 4

ER -