Abstract
This paper analyses second-best optimal environmental policy responses to real and financial shocks in a two-period partial equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms, an environmental externality, and credit constraints. We show that, to alleviate credit constraints and encourage investment, the second-best optimal emission tax falls short of marginal emission damages. The optimal response to shocks depends on how the shock affects the size of the environmental and credit market failures and the effectiveness of the tax in alleviating these market failures. Under mildly restrictive assumptions on functional forms, the optimal response to a (persistent) negative productivity shock or a tightening of credit is to reduce the emission tax. Our results are informative for how climate change policy should optimally change with the business cycle.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 807-834 |
Journal | Environmental & Resource Economics |
Volume | 70 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2018 |
Keywords
- Credit constraints
- Credit shock
- Second-best optimal emission tax
- Productivity shock
- Recession