Does a recession call for less stringent environmental policy? A partial-equilibrium second-best analysis

Inge M. van den Bijgaart, Sjak Smulders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper analyses second-best optimal environmental policy responses to real and financial shocks in a two-period partial equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms, an environmental externality, and credit constraints. We show that, to alleviate credit constraints and encourage investment, the second-best optimal emission tax falls short of marginal emission damages. The optimal response to shocks depends on how the shock affects the size of the environmental and credit market failures and the effectiveness of the tax in alleviating these market failures. Under mildly restrictive assumptions on functional forms, the optimal response to a (persistent) negative productivity shock or a tightening of credit is to reduce the emission tax. Our results are informative for how climate change policy should optimally change with the business cycle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)807-834
JournalEnvironmental & Resource Economics
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Credit constraints
  • Credit shock
  • Second-best optimal emission tax
  • Productivity shock
  • Recession

Cite this

@article{f3d9dd3decd947b29698dfbf2278e047,
title = "Does a recession call for less stringent environmental policy? A partial-equilibrium second-best analysis",
abstract = "This paper analyses second-best optimal environmental policy responses to real and financial shocks in a two-period partial equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms, an environmental externality, and credit constraints. We show that, to alleviate credit constraints and encourage investment, the second-best optimal emission tax falls short of marginal emission damages. The optimal response to shocks depends on how the shock affects the size of the environmental and credit market failures and the effectiveness of the tax in alleviating these market failures. Under mildly restrictive assumptions on functional forms, the optimal response to a (persistent) negative productivity shock or a tightening of credit is to reduce the emission tax. Our results are informative for how climate change policy should optimally change with the business cycle.",
keywords = "Credit constraints, Credit shock, Second-best optimal emission tax, Productivity shock, Recession",
author = "{van den Bijgaart}, {Inge M.} and Sjak Smulders",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s10640-017-0157-0",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "807--834",
journal = "Environmental and Resource Economics",
issn = "0924-6460",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Does a recession call for less stringent environmental policy? A partial-equilibrium second-best analysis. / van den Bijgaart, Inge M.; Smulders, Sjak.

In: Environmental & Resource Economics, Vol. 70, No. 4, 08.2018, p. 807-834.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does a recession call for less stringent environmental policy? A partial-equilibrium second-best analysis

AU - van den Bijgaart, Inge M.

AU - Smulders, Sjak

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - This paper analyses second-best optimal environmental policy responses to real and financial shocks in a two-period partial equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms, an environmental externality, and credit constraints. We show that, to alleviate credit constraints and encourage investment, the second-best optimal emission tax falls short of marginal emission damages. The optimal response to shocks depends on how the shock affects the size of the environmental and credit market failures and the effectiveness of the tax in alleviating these market failures. Under mildly restrictive assumptions on functional forms, the optimal response to a (persistent) negative productivity shock or a tightening of credit is to reduce the emission tax. Our results are informative for how climate change policy should optimally change with the business cycle.

AB - This paper analyses second-best optimal environmental policy responses to real and financial shocks in a two-period partial equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms, an environmental externality, and credit constraints. We show that, to alleviate credit constraints and encourage investment, the second-best optimal emission tax falls short of marginal emission damages. The optimal response to shocks depends on how the shock affects the size of the environmental and credit market failures and the effectiveness of the tax in alleviating these market failures. Under mildly restrictive assumptions on functional forms, the optimal response to a (persistent) negative productivity shock or a tightening of credit is to reduce the emission tax. Our results are informative for how climate change policy should optimally change with the business cycle.

KW - Credit constraints

KW - Credit shock

KW - Second-best optimal emission tax

KW - Productivity shock

KW - Recession

U2 - 10.1007/s10640-017-0157-0

DO - 10.1007/s10640-017-0157-0

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 807

EP - 834

JO - Environmental and Resource Economics

JF - Environmental and Resource Economics

SN - 0924-6460

IS - 4

ER -