Abstract
This paper analyses second-best optimal environmental policy responses to real and financial shocks in a two-period partial equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms, an environmental externality, and credit constraints. We show that, to alleviate credit constraints and encourage investment, the second-best optimal emission tax falls short of marginal emission damages. The optimal response to shocks depends on how the shock affects the size of the environmental and credit market failures and the effectiveness of the tax in alleviating these market failures. Under mildly restrictive assumptions on functional forms, the optimal response to a (persistent) negative productivity shock or a tightening of credit is to reduce the emission tax. Our results are informative for how climate change policy should optimally change with the business cycle.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 807-834 |
| Journal | Environmental & Resource Economics |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Credit constraints
- Credit shock
- Second-best optimal emission tax
- Productivity shock
- Recession
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does a recession call for less stringent environmental policy? A partial-equilibrium second-best analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver