Abstract
Frictions prevent banks to immediately adjust their capital ratio towards their desired and/or imposed level. This paper analyzes (i) whether or not these frictions are larger for regulatory capital ratios vis-à-vis a plain leverage ratio; (ii) which adjustment channels banks use to adjust their capital ratio; and (iii) how the speed of adjustment and adjustment channels differ between large, systemic and complex banks versus small banks. Our results, obtained using a sample of listed banks across OECD countries for the 2001–2012 period, bear critical policy implications for the implementation of new (systemic risk-based) capital requirements and their impact on banks’ balance sheets, specifically lending, and hence the real economy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 105518 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Banking & Finance |
| Volume | 151 |
| Early online date | 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- capital structure
- speed of adjustment
- systemic risk
- bank regulation
- lending
- balance sheet copmposition
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does banks’ systemic importance affect their capital structure and balance sheet adjustment processes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver