Does experience imply learning?

Jaideep Anand, Louis Mulotte, Charlotte R. Ren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Research traditionally uses experiential learning arguments to explain the existence of a positive relationship between repetition of an activity and performance. We propose an additional interpretation of this relationship in the context of discrete corporate development activities. We argue that firms choose to repeat successful activities, thereby accumulating high experience with them. Data on 437 aircraft projects introduced through three governance modes show that the positive performance effect of the firm's experience with the focal mode becomes insignificant after accounting for experience endogeneity. We suggest that in a general case, experience with corporate development activities may be tinged with both learning and selection effects. Therefore, omitting to account for experience endogeneity may lead to incorrect conclusions from an “empirically observed” positive experience–performance relationship.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1395-1412
Number of pages18
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume37
Issue number7
Early online date16 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Endogeneity
Learning effect
Governance mode
Experiential learning
Aircraft
Selection effects

Keywords

  • corporate development activities
  • experience
  • learning
  • endogeneity
  • make-ally-by choices

Cite this

Anand, Jaideep ; Mulotte, Louis ; Ren, Charlotte R. / Does experience imply learning?. In: Strategic Management Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 7. pp. 1395-1412.
@article{c81fbb610eb840838ad4787473d439b4,
title = "Does experience imply learning?",
abstract = "Research traditionally uses experiential learning arguments to explain the existence of a positive relationship between repetition of an activity and performance. We propose an additional interpretation of this relationship in the context of discrete corporate development activities. We argue that firms choose to repeat successful activities, thereby accumulating high experience with them. Data on 437 aircraft projects introduced through three governance modes show that the positive performance effect of the firm's experience with the focal mode becomes insignificant after accounting for experience endogeneity. We suggest that in a general case, experience with corporate development activities may be tinged with both learning and selection effects. Therefore, omitting to account for experience endogeneity may lead to incorrect conclusions from an “empirically observed” positive experience–performance relationship.",
keywords = "corporate development activities, experience, learning, endogeneity, make-ally-by choices",
author = "Jaideep Anand and Louis Mulotte and Ren, {Charlotte R.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2401",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1395--1412",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Does experience imply learning? / Anand, Jaideep; Mulotte, Louis; Ren, Charlotte R.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 7, 07.2016, p. 1395-1412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does experience imply learning?

AU - Anand, Jaideep

AU - Mulotte, Louis

AU - Ren, Charlotte R.

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - Research traditionally uses experiential learning arguments to explain the existence of a positive relationship between repetition of an activity and performance. We propose an additional interpretation of this relationship in the context of discrete corporate development activities. We argue that firms choose to repeat successful activities, thereby accumulating high experience with them. Data on 437 aircraft projects introduced through three governance modes show that the positive performance effect of the firm's experience with the focal mode becomes insignificant after accounting for experience endogeneity. We suggest that in a general case, experience with corporate development activities may be tinged with both learning and selection effects. Therefore, omitting to account for experience endogeneity may lead to incorrect conclusions from an “empirically observed” positive experience–performance relationship.

AB - Research traditionally uses experiential learning arguments to explain the existence of a positive relationship between repetition of an activity and performance. We propose an additional interpretation of this relationship in the context of discrete corporate development activities. We argue that firms choose to repeat successful activities, thereby accumulating high experience with them. Data on 437 aircraft projects introduced through three governance modes show that the positive performance effect of the firm's experience with the focal mode becomes insignificant after accounting for experience endogeneity. We suggest that in a general case, experience with corporate development activities may be tinged with both learning and selection effects. Therefore, omitting to account for experience endogeneity may lead to incorrect conclusions from an “empirically observed” positive experience–performance relationship.

KW - corporate development activities

KW - experience

KW - learning

KW - endogeneity

KW - make-ally-by choices

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2401

DO - 10.1002/smj.2401

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1395

EP - 1412

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 7

ER -