Does it pay to have friends? Social ties and executive appointments in banking

A.N. Berger, T. Kick, M. Koetter, K. Schaeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We exploit a unique sample to analyze how homophily (affinity for similar others) and social ties affect career outcomes in banking. We test if these factors increase the probability that the appointee to an executive board is an outsider without previous employment at the bank compared to being an insider. Homophily based on age and gender increase the chances of the outsider appointments. Similar educational backgrounds, in contrast, reduce the chance that the appointee is an outsider. Greater social ties also increase the probability of an outside appointment. Results from a duration model show that larger age differences shorten tenure significantly, whereas gender similarities barely affect tenure. Differences in educational backgrounds affect tenure differently across the banking sectors. Maintaining more contacts to the executive board reduces tenure. We also find weak evidence that social ties are associated with reduced profitability, consistent with cronyism in banking.

Highlights

► We analyze how homophily and social ties affect career outcomes in banking. ► Homophily based on age and gender increase the chances of the outsider appointments. ► Similar educational backgrounds reduce the chance that the appointee is an outsider. ► Greater social ties increase the probability of an outside appointment. ► We also find weak evidence of cronyism in banking.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2087-2105
JournalJournal of Banking and Finance
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Social ties
Banking
Outsider
Tenure
Homophily
Education
Cronyism
Career outcomes
Duration models
Profitability
Age differences
Insider
Factors
Banking sector

Cite this

Berger, A.N. ; Kick, T. ; Koetter, M. ; Schaeck, K. / Does it pay to have friends? Social ties and executive appointments in banking. In: Journal of Banking and Finance. 2013 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 2087-2105.
@article{96d2937cdd194425bcdf22e688f45dfd,
title = "Does it pay to have friends? Social ties and executive appointments in banking",
abstract = "We exploit a unique sample to analyze how homophily (affinity for similar others) and social ties affect career outcomes in banking. We test if these factors increase the probability that the appointee to an executive board is an outsider without previous employment at the bank compared to being an insider. Homophily based on age and gender increase the chances of the outsider appointments. Similar educational backgrounds, in contrast, reduce the chance that the appointee is an outsider. Greater social ties also increase the probability of an outside appointment. Results from a duration model show that larger age differences shorten tenure significantly, whereas gender similarities barely affect tenure. Differences in educational backgrounds affect tenure differently across the banking sectors. Maintaining more contacts to the executive board reduces tenure. We also find weak evidence that social ties are associated with reduced profitability, consistent with cronyism in banking.Highlights► We analyze how homophily and social ties affect career outcomes in banking. ► Homophily based on age and gender increase the chances of the outsider appointments. ► Similar educational backgrounds reduce the chance that the appointee is an outsider. ► Greater social ties increase the probability of an outside appointment. ► We also find weak evidence of cronyism in banking.",
author = "A.N. Berger and T. Kick and M. Koetter and K. Schaeck",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.040",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "2087--2105",
journal = "Journal of Banking and Finance",
issn = "0378-4266",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",
number = "6",

}

Does it pay to have friends? Social ties and executive appointments in banking. / Berger, A.N.; Kick, T.; Koetter, M.; Schaeck, K.

In: Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2013, p. 2087-2105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does it pay to have friends? Social ties and executive appointments in banking

AU - Berger, A.N.

AU - Kick, T.

AU - Koetter, M.

AU - Schaeck, K.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We exploit a unique sample to analyze how homophily (affinity for similar others) and social ties affect career outcomes in banking. We test if these factors increase the probability that the appointee to an executive board is an outsider without previous employment at the bank compared to being an insider. Homophily based on age and gender increase the chances of the outsider appointments. Similar educational backgrounds, in contrast, reduce the chance that the appointee is an outsider. Greater social ties also increase the probability of an outside appointment. Results from a duration model show that larger age differences shorten tenure significantly, whereas gender similarities barely affect tenure. Differences in educational backgrounds affect tenure differently across the banking sectors. Maintaining more contacts to the executive board reduces tenure. We also find weak evidence that social ties are associated with reduced profitability, consistent with cronyism in banking.Highlights► We analyze how homophily and social ties affect career outcomes in banking. ► Homophily based on age and gender increase the chances of the outsider appointments. ► Similar educational backgrounds reduce the chance that the appointee is an outsider. ► Greater social ties increase the probability of an outside appointment. ► We also find weak evidence of cronyism in banking.

AB - We exploit a unique sample to analyze how homophily (affinity for similar others) and social ties affect career outcomes in banking. We test if these factors increase the probability that the appointee to an executive board is an outsider without previous employment at the bank compared to being an insider. Homophily based on age and gender increase the chances of the outsider appointments. Similar educational backgrounds, in contrast, reduce the chance that the appointee is an outsider. Greater social ties also increase the probability of an outside appointment. Results from a duration model show that larger age differences shorten tenure significantly, whereas gender similarities barely affect tenure. Differences in educational backgrounds affect tenure differently across the banking sectors. Maintaining more contacts to the executive board reduces tenure. We also find weak evidence that social ties are associated with reduced profitability, consistent with cronyism in banking.Highlights► We analyze how homophily and social ties affect career outcomes in banking. ► Homophily based on age and gender increase the chances of the outsider appointments. ► Similar educational backgrounds reduce the chance that the appointee is an outsider. ► Greater social ties increase the probability of an outside appointment. ► We also find weak evidence of cronyism in banking.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.040

DO - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.040

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 2087

EP - 2105

JO - Journal of Banking and Finance

JF - Journal of Banking and Finance

SN - 0378-4266

IS - 6

ER -