Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains?

A meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Although the effect of stereotype threat concerning women and mathematics has been subject to various systematic reviews, none of them have been performed on the sub-population of children and adolescents. In this meta-analysis we estimated the effects of stereotype threat on performance of girls on math, science and spatial skills (MSSS) tests. Moreover, we studied publication bias and four moderators: test difficulty, presence of boys, gender equality within countries, and the type of control group that was used in the studies. We selected study samples when the study included girls, samples had a mean age below 18 years, the design was (quasi-)experimental, the stereotype threat manipulation was administered between-subjects, and the dependent variable was a MSSS test related to a gender stereotype favoring boys. To analyze the 47 effect sizes, we used random effects and mixed effects models. The estimated mean effect size equaled − 0.22 and significantly differed from 0. None of the moderator variables was significant; however, there were several signs for the presence of publication bias. We conclude that publication bias might seriously distort the literature on the effects of stereotype threat among schoolgirls. We propose a large replication study to provide a less biased effect size estimate.
Keywords: Stereotype threat, Math/science test performance, Gender gap, Test anxiety, Publication bias , Meta-analysis
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-44
JournalJournal of School Psychology
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Publication Bias
stereotype
threat
performance
Mathematics
trend
moderator
gender
science
manipulation
equality
mathematics
anxiety
adolescent

Cite this

@article{b3c2daca855f45c8a01ac3866a5d3124,
title = "Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains?: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Although the effect of stereotype threat concerning women and mathematics has been subject to various systematic reviews, none of them have been performed on the sub-population of children and adolescents. In this meta-analysis we estimated the effects of stereotype threat on performance of girls on math, science and spatial skills (MSSS) tests. Moreover, we studied publication bias and four moderators: test difficulty, presence of boys, gender equality within countries, and the type of control group that was used in the studies. We selected study samples when the study included girls, samples had a mean age below 18 years, the design was (quasi-)experimental, the stereotype threat manipulation was administered between-subjects, and the dependent variable was a MSSS test related to a gender stereotype favoring boys. To analyze the 47 effect sizes, we used random effects and mixed effects models. The estimated mean effect size equaled − 0.22 and significantly differed from 0. None of the moderator variables was significant; however, there were several signs for the presence of publication bias. We conclude that publication bias might seriously distort the literature on the effects of stereotype threat among schoolgirls. We propose a large replication study to provide a less biased effect size estimate.Keywords: Stereotype threat, Math/science test performance, Gender gap, Test anxiety, Publication bias , Meta-analysis",
author = "P.C. Flore and J.M. Wicherts",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "25--44",
journal = "Journal of School Psychology",
issn = "0022-4405",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. / Flore, P.C.; Wicherts, J.M.

In: Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2015, p. 25-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains?

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Flore, P.C.

AU - Wicherts, J.M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Although the effect of stereotype threat concerning women and mathematics has been subject to various systematic reviews, none of them have been performed on the sub-population of children and adolescents. In this meta-analysis we estimated the effects of stereotype threat on performance of girls on math, science and spatial skills (MSSS) tests. Moreover, we studied publication bias and four moderators: test difficulty, presence of boys, gender equality within countries, and the type of control group that was used in the studies. We selected study samples when the study included girls, samples had a mean age below 18 years, the design was (quasi-)experimental, the stereotype threat manipulation was administered between-subjects, and the dependent variable was a MSSS test related to a gender stereotype favoring boys. To analyze the 47 effect sizes, we used random effects and mixed effects models. The estimated mean effect size equaled − 0.22 and significantly differed from 0. None of the moderator variables was significant; however, there were several signs for the presence of publication bias. We conclude that publication bias might seriously distort the literature on the effects of stereotype threat among schoolgirls. We propose a large replication study to provide a less biased effect size estimate.Keywords: Stereotype threat, Math/science test performance, Gender gap, Test anxiety, Publication bias , Meta-analysis

AB - Although the effect of stereotype threat concerning women and mathematics has been subject to various systematic reviews, none of them have been performed on the sub-population of children and adolescents. In this meta-analysis we estimated the effects of stereotype threat on performance of girls on math, science and spatial skills (MSSS) tests. Moreover, we studied publication bias and four moderators: test difficulty, presence of boys, gender equality within countries, and the type of control group that was used in the studies. We selected study samples when the study included girls, samples had a mean age below 18 years, the design was (quasi-)experimental, the stereotype threat manipulation was administered between-subjects, and the dependent variable was a MSSS test related to a gender stereotype favoring boys. To analyze the 47 effect sizes, we used random effects and mixed effects models. The estimated mean effect size equaled − 0.22 and significantly differed from 0. None of the moderator variables was significant; however, there were several signs for the presence of publication bias. We conclude that publication bias might seriously distort the literature on the effects of stereotype threat among schoolgirls. We propose a large replication study to provide a less biased effect size estimate.Keywords: Stereotype threat, Math/science test performance, Gender gap, Test anxiety, Publication bias , Meta-analysis

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 25

EP - 44

JO - Journal of School Psychology

JF - Journal of School Psychology

SN - 0022-4405

IS - 1

ER -