Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States

J.E. Ligthart, M. Rider, R. Wang

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

338 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract Abstract This paper empirically investigates the effect of fiscal decentralization on public safety, which is widely taken as an important issue in evaluating the performance of public service. In addition, we provide evidence to the transmission channels of the decentralization effect. In a decentralized setting, the fiscal competition between jurisdictions motivates local governments to provide better crime control service, but as illustrated in this paper, the externality in the prevention of mobile crime can offset the beneficial effect of jurisdictional competition. Using panel data for the United States from 1990 to 2009, we find the fiscal decentralization generally lowers the crime rate, but the effect is smaller for mobile crime than immobile crime. The findings provide strong empirical support to our hypothesis and the underlying mechanism, and the results are robust to various fiscal decentralization measures and model specifications.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherEconomics
Number of pages40
Volume2013-021
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2013-021

Fingerprint

Fiscal decentralization
Crime
Public safety
Service control
Crime rates
Jurisdiction
Externalities
Model specification
Transmission channel
Public services
Local government
Fiscal competition
Panel data
Decentralization

Keywords

  • Fiscal Decentralization
  • Crime rate
  • Mobility of Crime

Cite this

Ligthart, J. E., Rider, M., & Wang, R. (2013). Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2013-021). Tilburg: Economics.
Ligthart, J.E. ; Rider, M. ; Wang, R. / Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States. Tilburg : Economics, 2013. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{323ee27bdcc94d829587c4b6e6f90a2c,
title = "Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States",
abstract = "Abstract Abstract This paper empirically investigates the effect of fiscal decentralization on public safety, which is widely taken as an important issue in evaluating the performance of public service. In addition, we provide evidence to the transmission channels of the decentralization effect. In a decentralized setting, the fiscal competition between jurisdictions motivates local governments to provide better crime control service, but as illustrated in this paper, the externality in the prevention of mobile crime can offset the beneficial effect of jurisdictional competition. Using panel data for the United States from 1990 to 2009, we find the fiscal decentralization generally lowers the crime rate, but the effect is smaller for mobile crime than immobile crime. The findings provide strong empirical support to our hypothesis and the underlying mechanism, and the results are robust to various fiscal decentralization measures and model specifications.",
keywords = "Fiscal Decentralization, Crime rate, Mobility of Crime",
author = "J.E. Ligthart and M. Rider and R. Wang",
note = "Pagination: 40",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "2013-021",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Economics",

}

Ligthart, JE, Rider, M & Wang, R 2013 'Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2013-021, Economics, Tilburg.

Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States. / Ligthart, J.E.; Rider, M.; Wang, R.

Tilburg : Economics, 2013. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2013-021).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States

AU - Ligthart, J.E.

AU - Rider, M.

AU - Wang, R.

N1 - Pagination: 40

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Abstract Abstract This paper empirically investigates the effect of fiscal decentralization on public safety, which is widely taken as an important issue in evaluating the performance of public service. In addition, we provide evidence to the transmission channels of the decentralization effect. In a decentralized setting, the fiscal competition between jurisdictions motivates local governments to provide better crime control service, but as illustrated in this paper, the externality in the prevention of mobile crime can offset the beneficial effect of jurisdictional competition. Using panel data for the United States from 1990 to 2009, we find the fiscal decentralization generally lowers the crime rate, but the effect is smaller for mobile crime than immobile crime. The findings provide strong empirical support to our hypothesis and the underlying mechanism, and the results are robust to various fiscal decentralization measures and model specifications.

AB - Abstract Abstract This paper empirically investigates the effect of fiscal decentralization on public safety, which is widely taken as an important issue in evaluating the performance of public service. In addition, we provide evidence to the transmission channels of the decentralization effect. In a decentralized setting, the fiscal competition between jurisdictions motivates local governments to provide better crime control service, but as illustrated in this paper, the externality in the prevention of mobile crime can offset the beneficial effect of jurisdictional competition. Using panel data for the United States from 1990 to 2009, we find the fiscal decentralization generally lowers the crime rate, but the effect is smaller for mobile crime than immobile crime. The findings provide strong empirical support to our hypothesis and the underlying mechanism, and the results are robust to various fiscal decentralization measures and model specifications.

KW - Fiscal Decentralization

KW - Crime rate

KW - Mobility of Crime

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2013-021

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States

PB - Economics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Ligthart JE, Rider M, Wang R. Does the Fiscal Decentralization Promote Public Safety? Evidence from United States. Tilburg: Economics. 2013. (CentER Discussion Paper).