Abstract
The diversification bias in repeated lotteries is the finding that a majority of participants fail to select the option offering the highest probability. This phenomenon is systematic and immune to classical manipulations (e.g. monetary rewards). We apply dual process theories and argue that the diversification bias is a consequence of System 1 (automatic, intuitive, associative) triggering a matching response, which fails to be corrected by System 2 (intentional, analytic, rational). Empirically, supporting the corrective functions of System 2 through appropriate contextual cues (describing the task as a statistical test rather than as a lottery) led to a decrease of diversification.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 145-154 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Risk and Uncertainty |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2007 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- dual process theories
- diversification
- probability matching
- statistical independence
- VARIETY-SEEKING
- PROBABILITY
- CHOICE
- RATIONALITY
- PERSPECTIVE