TY - JOUR
T1 - Dual-tasking during recall of negative memories or during visual perception of images
T2 - Effects on vividness and emotionality
AU - Cuperus, Anne A.
AU - Laken, Maarten
AU - van Schie, Kevin
AU - Engelhard, Iris M.
AU - van den Hout, Marcel A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Triple (Alkmaar, the Netherlands) for providing us with the hardware necessary to carry out the experiment. MAH is supported by a TOP grant (40-00812-98-12030) from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). IME is supported with a Vici grant (453-15-005) from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.
Funding Information:
We are grateful to Triple (Alkmaar, the Netherlands) for providing us with the hardware necessary to carry out the experiment. MAH is supported by a TOP grant ( 40-00812-98-12030 ) from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). IME is supported with a Vici grant ( 453-15-005 ) from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Background and objectives: Several treatments are effective in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. We tested the effectiveness of an experimental intervention that consists of elements from two of these: virtual reality (VR) exposure therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. The latter is characterized by a dual-task approach: the patient holds a traumatic memory in mind while simultaneously making voluntary eye movements, resulting in reduced vividness and emotionality of the traumatic memory. If the experimental intervention is effective, it could provide a useful approach for highly avoidant individuals. Methods: Participants recalled negative memories induced by a VR paradigm. The experimental group viewed VR screenshots that represented these negative memories while carrying out a dual-task. One control group recalled negative memories while carrying out the same dual-task (a standard dual-task condition) and another merely viewed the VR screenshots. Pre-to-post changes in self-rated memory vividness/emotionality were measured. Results: The results indicate that viewing a screenshot only was outperformed by both dual-task interventions in terms of reductions in vividness/emotionality. Furthermore, the dual-task interventions had a comparable impact on vividness, but the screenshot variant led to greater decreases in emotionality. Limitations: Changes in memory vividness/emotionality were only assessed shortly after the interventions and no measures of avoidance behavior were included in the study. Conclusions: Looking at an image in VR that represents a memory while carrying out a dual-task may be at least as effective as recalling the memory during the dual-task. Interestingly, visually supporting a negative memory does not seem to prevent memory degrading by dual-tasking.
AB - Background and objectives: Several treatments are effective in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. We tested the effectiveness of an experimental intervention that consists of elements from two of these: virtual reality (VR) exposure therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. The latter is characterized by a dual-task approach: the patient holds a traumatic memory in mind while simultaneously making voluntary eye movements, resulting in reduced vividness and emotionality of the traumatic memory. If the experimental intervention is effective, it could provide a useful approach for highly avoidant individuals. Methods: Participants recalled negative memories induced by a VR paradigm. The experimental group viewed VR screenshots that represented these negative memories while carrying out a dual-task. One control group recalled negative memories while carrying out the same dual-task (a standard dual-task condition) and another merely viewed the VR screenshots. Pre-to-post changes in self-rated memory vividness/emotionality were measured. Results: The results indicate that viewing a screenshot only was outperformed by both dual-task interventions in terms of reductions in vividness/emotionality. Furthermore, the dual-task interventions had a comparable impact on vividness, but the screenshot variant led to greater decreases in emotionality. Limitations: Changes in memory vividness/emotionality were only assessed shortly after the interventions and no measures of avoidance behavior were included in the study. Conclusions: Looking at an image in VR that represents a memory while carrying out a dual-task may be at least as effective as recalling the memory during the dual-task. Interestingly, visually supporting a negative memory does not seem to prevent memory degrading by dual-tasking.
KW - Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing
KW - Virtual reality exposure
KW - Virtual reality paradigm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054451699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.10.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.10.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 30316043
AN - SCOPUS:85054451699
SN - 0005-7916
VL - 62
SP - 112
EP - 116
JO - Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
ER -