Obowiązek udostępnienia urządzenia kluczowego w świetle wspólnotowych reguł konkurencji

Translated title of the contribution: Duty to provide access to essential facilities under European Competition Law

Agnieszka Janczuk

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The essential facilities doctrine is a powerful tool for compelling dominant undertakings to share their products or services when these inputs are indispensable for another undertaking to perform business activity. The main objective of the essential facilities doctrine is to stimulate competition in related markets. However, due to its divergent effects, the doctrine should be applied carefully. The central focus of this article is on the two issues of a great practical significance – legitimate business justifications of the refusal to deal and terms under which compulsory access should be granted.

    Once the facility has been determined to be indispensable, the next question is whether the refusal to supply is objectively justified. There are two different kinds of justifications – of 'micro' and 'macro' level. From the micro point of view the circumstances of the particular owner of the facility are relevant. This article points out that the concept of objective justifications at a micro level involves also that of proportionality. At the macro level, in turn, the pro-competitive impacts and negative effects of the doctrine should be balanced. It follows that while deciding about the compulsory access to the facility, the allocative and dynamic efficiencies should be considered and the doctrine should be applied only when benefits to competition outweigh the costs of antitrust intervention.

    The second important issue addressed by this article relates to the terms of mandatory access to essential facilities. The main conclusion is that it must be provided on a nondiscriminatory basis and at a reasonable price. This article outlines that also the mandated terms are crucial for the static and dynamic competition.
    Original languageOther
    Title of host publicationPrawo wspólnotowe: wybrane problemy
    Place of PublicationWarsaw
    PublisherWydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza
    Pages105-128
    ISBN (Print)83-60201-09-9
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2005

    Publication series

    NameStudia z Dziedziny Prawa Unii Europejskiej
    Volume6

    Fingerprint

    doctrine
    Law
    macro level
    proportionality
    micro level
    supply
    efficiency
    market
    costs

    Cite this

    Janczuk, A. (2005). Obowiązek udostępnienia urządzenia kluczowego w świetle wspólnotowych reguł konkurencji. In Prawo wspólnotowe: wybrane problemy: Selected problems (pp. 105-128). (Studia z Dziedziny Prawa Unii Europejskiej; Vol. 6). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza.
    Janczuk, Agnieszka. / Obowiązek udostępnienia urządzenia kluczowego w świetle wspólnotowych reguł konkurencji. Prawo wspólnotowe: wybrane problemy: Selected problems. Warsaw : Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza, 2005. pp. 105-128 (Studia z Dziedziny Prawa Unii Europejskiej).
    @inbook{418a87a074eb4722bee76eb85d45062f,
    title = "Obowiązek udostępnienia urządzenia kluczowego w świetle wsp{\'o}lnotowych reguł konkurencji",
    abstract = "The essential facilities doctrine is a powerful tool for compelling dominant undertakings to share their products or services when these inputs are indispensable for another undertaking to perform business activity. The main objective of the essential facilities doctrine is to stimulate competition in related markets. However, due to its divergent effects, the doctrine should be applied carefully. The central focus of this article is on the two issues of a great practical significance – legitimate business justifications of the refusal to deal and terms under which compulsory access should be granted. Once the facility has been determined to be indispensable, the next question is whether the refusal to supply is objectively justified. There are two different kinds of justifications – of 'micro' and 'macro' level. From the micro point of view the circumstances of the particular owner of the facility are relevant. This article points out that the concept of objective justifications at a micro level involves also that of proportionality. At the macro level, in turn, the pro-competitive impacts and negative effects of the doctrine should be balanced. It follows that while deciding about the compulsory access to the facility, the allocative and dynamic efficiencies should be considered and the doctrine should be applied only when benefits to competition outweigh the costs of antitrust intervention.The second important issue addressed by this article relates to the terms of mandatory access to essential facilities. The main conclusion is that it must be provided on a nondiscriminatory basis and at a reasonable price. This article outlines that also the mandated terms are crucial for the static and dynamic competition.",
    author = "Agnieszka Janczuk",
    year = "2005",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    language = "Other",
    isbn = "83-60201-09-9",
    series = "Studia z Dziedziny Prawa Unii Europejskiej",
    publisher = "Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza",
    pages = "105--128",
    booktitle = "Prawo wsp{\'o}lnotowe: wybrane problemy",

    }

    Janczuk, A 2005, Obowiązek udostępnienia urządzenia kluczowego w świetle wspólnotowych reguł konkurencji. in Prawo wspólnotowe: wybrane problemy: Selected problems. Studia z Dziedziny Prawa Unii Europejskiej, vol. 6, Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza, Warsaw, pp. 105-128.

    Obowiązek udostępnienia urządzenia kluczowego w świetle wspólnotowych reguł konkurencji. / Janczuk, Agnieszka.

    Prawo wspólnotowe: wybrane problemy: Selected problems. Warsaw : Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza, 2005. p. 105-128 (Studia z Dziedziny Prawa Unii Europejskiej; Vol. 6).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Obowiązek udostępnienia urządzenia kluczowego w świetle wspólnotowych reguł konkurencji

    AU - Janczuk, Agnieszka

    PY - 2005/6/1

    Y1 - 2005/6/1

    N2 - The essential facilities doctrine is a powerful tool for compelling dominant undertakings to share their products or services when these inputs are indispensable for another undertaking to perform business activity. The main objective of the essential facilities doctrine is to stimulate competition in related markets. However, due to its divergent effects, the doctrine should be applied carefully. The central focus of this article is on the two issues of a great practical significance – legitimate business justifications of the refusal to deal and terms under which compulsory access should be granted. Once the facility has been determined to be indispensable, the next question is whether the refusal to supply is objectively justified. There are two different kinds of justifications – of 'micro' and 'macro' level. From the micro point of view the circumstances of the particular owner of the facility are relevant. This article points out that the concept of objective justifications at a micro level involves also that of proportionality. At the macro level, in turn, the pro-competitive impacts and negative effects of the doctrine should be balanced. It follows that while deciding about the compulsory access to the facility, the allocative and dynamic efficiencies should be considered and the doctrine should be applied only when benefits to competition outweigh the costs of antitrust intervention.The second important issue addressed by this article relates to the terms of mandatory access to essential facilities. The main conclusion is that it must be provided on a nondiscriminatory basis and at a reasonable price. This article outlines that also the mandated terms are crucial for the static and dynamic competition.

    AB - The essential facilities doctrine is a powerful tool for compelling dominant undertakings to share their products or services when these inputs are indispensable for another undertaking to perform business activity. The main objective of the essential facilities doctrine is to stimulate competition in related markets. However, due to its divergent effects, the doctrine should be applied carefully. The central focus of this article is on the two issues of a great practical significance – legitimate business justifications of the refusal to deal and terms under which compulsory access should be granted. Once the facility has been determined to be indispensable, the next question is whether the refusal to supply is objectively justified. There are two different kinds of justifications – of 'micro' and 'macro' level. From the micro point of view the circumstances of the particular owner of the facility are relevant. This article points out that the concept of objective justifications at a micro level involves also that of proportionality. At the macro level, in turn, the pro-competitive impacts and negative effects of the doctrine should be balanced. It follows that while deciding about the compulsory access to the facility, the allocative and dynamic efficiencies should be considered and the doctrine should be applied only when benefits to competition outweigh the costs of antitrust intervention.The second important issue addressed by this article relates to the terms of mandatory access to essential facilities. The main conclusion is that it must be provided on a nondiscriminatory basis and at a reasonable price. This article outlines that also the mandated terms are crucial for the static and dynamic competition.

    UR - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2187671

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 83-60201-09-9

    T3 - Studia z Dziedziny Prawa Unii Europejskiej

    SP - 105

    EP - 128

    BT - Prawo wspólnotowe: wybrane problemy

    PB - Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza

    CY - Warsaw

    ER -

    Janczuk A. Obowiązek udostępnienia urządzenia kluczowego w świetle wspólnotowych reguł konkurencji. In Prawo wspólnotowe: wybrane problemy: Selected problems. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza. 2005. p. 105-128. (Studia z Dziedziny Prawa Unii Europejskiej).