Dynamic order submission strategies with competition between a dealer market and a crossing network

H.A. Degryse, M. van Achter, G. Wuyts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We analyze a dynamic microstructure model in which a dealer market (DM) and a crossing network (CN) interact for three informational settings. A key result is that coexistence of trading systems generates systematic patterns in order flow, which depend on the degree of transparency. Further, we study overall welfare, measured by the gains from trade of all agents, and compare it with the maximum overall welfare. The discrepancy between both measures is attributable to two inefficiencies. Due to these inefficiencies, introducing a CN next to a DM, as well as increasing the transparency level, not necessarily produces greater overall welfare.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-338
JournalJournal of Financial Economics
Volume91
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dealer markets
Inefficiency
Transparency
Order flow
Gains from trade
Discrepancy
Trading systems
Microstructure
Coexistence

Cite this

Degryse, H.A. ; van Achter, M. ; Wuyts, G. / Dynamic order submission strategies with competition between a dealer market and a crossing network. In: Journal of Financial Economics. 2009 ; Vol. 91, No. 3. pp. 319-338.
@article{5fcb0d78c98443559f38efb09f8af3f9,
title = "Dynamic order submission strategies with competition between a dealer market and a crossing network",
abstract = "We analyze a dynamic microstructure model in which a dealer market (DM) and a crossing network (CN) interact for three informational settings. A key result is that coexistence of trading systems generates systematic patterns in order flow, which depend on the degree of transparency. Further, we study overall welfare, measured by the gains from trade of all agents, and compare it with the maximum overall welfare. The discrepancy between both measures is attributable to two inefficiencies. Due to these inefficiencies, introducing a CN next to a DM, as well as increasing the transparency level, not necessarily produces greater overall welfare.",
author = "H.A. Degryse and {van Achter}, M. and G. Wuyts",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "319--338",
journal = "Journal of Financial Economics",
issn = "0304-405X",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "3",

}

Dynamic order submission strategies with competition between a dealer market and a crossing network. / Degryse, H.A.; van Achter, M.; Wuyts, G.

In: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2009, p. 319-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic order submission strategies with competition between a dealer market and a crossing network

AU - Degryse, H.A.

AU - van Achter, M.

AU - Wuyts, G.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - We analyze a dynamic microstructure model in which a dealer market (DM) and a crossing network (CN) interact for three informational settings. A key result is that coexistence of trading systems generates systematic patterns in order flow, which depend on the degree of transparency. Further, we study overall welfare, measured by the gains from trade of all agents, and compare it with the maximum overall welfare. The discrepancy between both measures is attributable to two inefficiencies. Due to these inefficiencies, introducing a CN next to a DM, as well as increasing the transparency level, not necessarily produces greater overall welfare.

AB - We analyze a dynamic microstructure model in which a dealer market (DM) and a crossing network (CN) interact for three informational settings. A key result is that coexistence of trading systems generates systematic patterns in order flow, which depend on the degree of transparency. Further, we study overall welfare, measured by the gains from trade of all agents, and compare it with the maximum overall welfare. The discrepancy between both measures is attributable to two inefficiencies. Due to these inefficiencies, introducing a CN next to a DM, as well as increasing the transparency level, not necessarily produces greater overall welfare.

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 319

EP - 338

JO - Journal of Financial Economics

JF - Journal of Financial Economics

SN - 0304-405X

IS - 3

ER -