Early retirement behaviour in the Netherlands: Evidence from a policy reform

Rob Euwals Euwals, Daniël van Vuuren, Ronald Wolthoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

Abstract

In the early 1990s the Dutch labour unions and employer organisations agreed to transform the generous and actuarially unfair early retirement (ER) schemes into less generous and actuarially fair schemes that reward individuals for postponing retirement. The starting dates of these new ER programs varied by industry sector. In this study, we exploit this variation in starting dates to estimate the causal impact of the policy reform on early retirement behaviour. We use a large administrative dataset, the Dutch Income Panel 1989–2000, to estimate hazard rate models for the retirement age. We conclude that the policy reform has indeed induced workers to postpone retirement. Both the wealth effect (lower ER wealth) and the substitution effect (lower implicit taxes on retirement postponement) are significant, the latter being more substantial.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-236
JournalDe Economist
Volume158
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Early retirement
Retirement behavior
Policy reform
The Netherlands
Retirement
Industry
Labor unions
Wealth
Wealth effect
Hazard rate model
Income
Employers
Workers
Reward
Substitution effect
Postponement
Retirement age
Implicit taxes

Cite this

Euwals, Rob Euwals ; van Vuuren, Daniël ; Wolthoff, Ronald. / Early retirement behaviour in the Netherlands: Evidence from a policy reform. In: De Economist. 2010 ; Vol. 158, No. 3. pp. 209-236.
@article{635082c5f4bc4acf8b657af7755b9ad3,
title = "Early retirement behaviour in the Netherlands: Evidence from a policy reform",
abstract = "In the early 1990s the Dutch labour unions and employer organisations agreed to transform the generous and actuarially unfair early retirement (ER) schemes into less generous and actuarially fair schemes that reward individuals for postponing retirement. The starting dates of these new ER programs varied by industry sector. In this study, we exploit this variation in starting dates to estimate the causal impact of the policy reform on early retirement behaviour. We use a large administrative dataset, the Dutch Income Panel 1989–2000, to estimate hazard rate models for the retirement age. We conclude that the policy reform has indeed induced workers to postpone retirement. Both the wealth effect (lower ER wealth) and the substitution effect (lower implicit taxes on retirement postponement) are significant, the latter being more substantial.",
author = "Euwals, {Rob Euwals} and {van Vuuren}, Dani{\"e}l and Ronald Wolthoff",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s10645-010-9139-0",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "209--236",
journal = "De Economist: Tijdschrift voor alle standen, tot bevordering van volkswelvaart, door verspreiding van eenvoudige beginselen van staatshuishoudkunde",
issn = "0013-063X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Early retirement behaviour in the Netherlands: Evidence from a policy reform. / Euwals, Rob Euwals; van Vuuren, Daniël; Wolthoff, Ronald.

In: De Economist, Vol. 158, No. 3, 2010, p. 209-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early retirement behaviour in the Netherlands: Evidence from a policy reform

AU - Euwals, Rob Euwals

AU - van Vuuren, Daniël

AU - Wolthoff, Ronald

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In the early 1990s the Dutch labour unions and employer organisations agreed to transform the generous and actuarially unfair early retirement (ER) schemes into less generous and actuarially fair schemes that reward individuals for postponing retirement. The starting dates of these new ER programs varied by industry sector. In this study, we exploit this variation in starting dates to estimate the causal impact of the policy reform on early retirement behaviour. We use a large administrative dataset, the Dutch Income Panel 1989–2000, to estimate hazard rate models for the retirement age. We conclude that the policy reform has indeed induced workers to postpone retirement. Both the wealth effect (lower ER wealth) and the substitution effect (lower implicit taxes on retirement postponement) are significant, the latter being more substantial.

AB - In the early 1990s the Dutch labour unions and employer organisations agreed to transform the generous and actuarially unfair early retirement (ER) schemes into less generous and actuarially fair schemes that reward individuals for postponing retirement. The starting dates of these new ER programs varied by industry sector. In this study, we exploit this variation in starting dates to estimate the causal impact of the policy reform on early retirement behaviour. We use a large administrative dataset, the Dutch Income Panel 1989–2000, to estimate hazard rate models for the retirement age. We conclude that the policy reform has indeed induced workers to postpone retirement. Both the wealth effect (lower ER wealth) and the substitution effect (lower implicit taxes on retirement postponement) are significant, the latter being more substantial.

U2 - 10.1007/s10645-010-9139-0

DO - 10.1007/s10645-010-9139-0

M3 - Article

VL - 158

SP - 209

EP - 236

JO - De Economist: Tijdschrift voor alle standen, tot bevordering van volkswelvaart, door verspreiding van eenvoudige beginselen van staatshuishoudkunde

JF - De Economist: Tijdschrift voor alle standen, tot bevordering van volkswelvaart, door verspreiding van eenvoudige beginselen van staatshuishoudkunde

SN - 0013-063X

IS - 3

ER -