TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic evaluation of a stigma awareness intervention on reemployment of people with mental illness
T2 - Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial
AU - Janssens, K.M.E.
AU - Geraerds, S.J.L.M.
AU - Polinder, S.
AU - van Weeghel, J.
AU - Henderson, C.
AU - Joosen, M.C.W.
AU - Brouwers, E.P.M.
N1 - Projectcode: 42001855
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - People with mental illness are more often unemployed, which may party be explained by the stigma attached to mental illness. Both unemployment and mental ill-health is associated with high economic and societal costs. In this study the costs and benefits of implementing a stigma awareness intervention into vocational rehabilitation is investigated. In a cluster randomized controlled trial, 119 unemployed people with mental illness were allocated into two groups: (a) vocational rehabilitation as usual and (b) vocational rehabilitation combined with a stigma awareness intervention. Primary outcomes were finding and retaining employment and becoming independent of social benefits. These data were extracted from nationwide registers over 12 months. Self-report health care costs and quality-adjusted life years were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Participants in the intervention group had better work participation outcomes and better outcomes concerning becoming independent of social benefits than participants in the control group. For participants in the control group, mean total costs for social benefits and health care costs together were €11,228 (SD = €6,451, IQR = €6,367–€14,324). For the intervention group, mean total costs for social benefits, health care costs and intervention costs were €9,893 (SD = €5,181, IQR = €5,187–€13,745; p = .411, d = 0.080). However, the differences in these costs and use were not statistically significant. Although the intervention is not cost effective, implementing a stigma awareness intervention may be beneficial for unemployed people with mental illness, as it is not more expensive than vocational rehabilitation as usual.
AB - People with mental illness are more often unemployed, which may party be explained by the stigma attached to mental illness. Both unemployment and mental ill-health is associated with high economic and societal costs. In this study the costs and benefits of implementing a stigma awareness intervention into vocational rehabilitation is investigated. In a cluster randomized controlled trial, 119 unemployed people with mental illness were allocated into two groups: (a) vocational rehabilitation as usual and (b) vocational rehabilitation combined with a stigma awareness intervention. Primary outcomes were finding and retaining employment and becoming independent of social benefits. These data were extracted from nationwide registers over 12 months. Self-report health care costs and quality-adjusted life years were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Participants in the intervention group had better work participation outcomes and better outcomes concerning becoming independent of social benefits than participants in the control group. For participants in the control group, mean total costs for social benefits and health care costs together were €11,228 (SD = €6,451, IQR = €6,367–€14,324). For the intervention group, mean total costs for social benefits, health care costs and intervention costs were €9,893 (SD = €5,181, IQR = €5,187–€13,745; p = .411, d = 0.080). However, the differences in these costs and use were not statistically significant. Although the intervention is not cost effective, implementing a stigma awareness intervention may be beneficial for unemployed people with mental illness, as it is not more expensive than vocational rehabilitation as usual.
U2 - 10.1037/sah0000583
DO - 10.1037/sah0000583
M3 - Article
SN - 2376-6972
JO - Stigma and Health
JF - Stigma and Health
ER -