Economic freedoms and labour standards in the European Union

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)
    202 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Jan Cremers has contributed with a main article in Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research (Vol. 22-2). It was published by Sage ahead of print. His article examines the problematic relationship between economic freedoms and labour standards in the context of cross-border labour recruitment. It starts with a summary of the relevant EU acquis, in particular rules concerning social security coordination and the pay and working conditions of posted workers. It reviews key issues of the ‘hard core’ of the internal market legislation (free choice of contracts, freedom of establishment for firms, deregulation of the ‘business environment’ and free provision of services). It also identifies experiences of rule-enforcing institutions: regime shopping, non-compliance with social standards, lack of cross-border enforcement, the difficulty of tracing circumvention in a transnational context and weak sanctioning mechanisms. The possibility of verifying, legally and in practice, whether a worker is correctly posted within the framework of the provision of services has become an Achilles heel of the enforcement of the use of cross-border recruited labour. The author finally assesses whether the 2014 Enforcement Directive can be seen as an effective remedy for the identified problems.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberMain article
    Pages (from-to)1-14
    Number of pages14
    JournalTransfer: European Review of Labour and Research
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    Early online date11 Mar 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2016

    Keywords

    • free movement, recruitment, compliance, regime-shopping, posting, social security

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Economic freedoms and labour standards in the European Union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this