Economic hardship and well-being: Examining the relative role of individual resources and welfare state effort in resilience against economic hardship

T. Reeskens, Leen Vandecasteele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With the aftermath of the economic crisis starting to fold out, the extent and the conditions under which the experience of economic hardship thwarts subjective well-being spark academic interest. In this paper, we examine the cushioning impact of three immaterial buffers embedded within civil society—namely social networks, religiosity, and confidence in politics—in combination with the cushioning role of the welfare state. Analyzing the 2010 wave of the European Social Survey, the results confirm that the experience of economic hardship is inversely related to happiness. All three proposed protective measures cushion the negative impact of economic strain on happiness, whereby the positive effect of social networks and confidence in politics is stronger in countries with lower levels of social expenditure. The latter finding provides some evidence for the crowding out-thesis but mainly suggests that a strong welfare state can take over the role of protective buffers in civil society, which is helpful as such buffers are less present among the most vulnerable social groups. The results of the analysis are discussed in relation to social science research and public policy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41–62
JournalJournal of Happiness Studies
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

welfare state
resilience
well-being
happiness
social network
confidence
resources
social expenditures
crowding out
economics
ESS
research policy
economic crisis
civil society
experience
public policy
social science
politics
evidence

Keywords

  • Subjective well-being
  • Economic hardship
  • Resilience
  • Crowding-out thesis
  • Comparative welfare state analysis
  • European Social Survey

Cite this

@article{f6b956d9945142fda91da5b8ee03beb2,
title = "Economic hardship and well-being: Examining the relative role of individual resources and welfare state effort in resilience against economic hardship",
abstract = "With the aftermath of the economic crisis starting to fold out, the extent and the conditions under which the experience of economic hardship thwarts subjective well-being spark academic interest. In this paper, we examine the cushioning impact of three immaterial buffers embedded within civil society—namely social networks, religiosity, and confidence in politics—in combination with the cushioning role of the welfare state. Analyzing the 2010 wave of the European Social Survey, the results confirm that the experience of economic hardship is inversely related to happiness. All three proposed protective measures cushion the negative impact of economic strain on happiness, whereby the positive effect of social networks and confidence in politics is stronger in countries with lower levels of social expenditure. The latter finding provides some evidence for the crowding out-thesis but mainly suggests that a strong welfare state can take over the role of protective buffers in civil society, which is helpful as such buffers are less present among the most vulnerable social groups. The results of the analysis are discussed in relation to social science research and public policy.",
keywords = "Subjective well-being, Economic hardship, Resilience, Crowding-out thesis, Comparative welfare state analysis, European Social Survey",
author = "T. Reeskens and Leen Vandecasteele",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s10902-016-9716-2",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "41–62",
journal = "Journal of Happiness Studies",
issn = "1389-4978",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Economic hardship and well-being : Examining the relative role of individual resources and welfare state effort in resilience against economic hardship. / Reeskens, T.; Vandecasteele, Leen.

In: Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2017, p. 41–62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic hardship and well-being

T2 - Examining the relative role of individual resources and welfare state effort in resilience against economic hardship

AU - Reeskens, T.

AU - Vandecasteele, Leen

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - With the aftermath of the economic crisis starting to fold out, the extent and the conditions under which the experience of economic hardship thwarts subjective well-being spark academic interest. In this paper, we examine the cushioning impact of three immaterial buffers embedded within civil society—namely social networks, religiosity, and confidence in politics—in combination with the cushioning role of the welfare state. Analyzing the 2010 wave of the European Social Survey, the results confirm that the experience of economic hardship is inversely related to happiness. All three proposed protective measures cushion the negative impact of economic strain on happiness, whereby the positive effect of social networks and confidence in politics is stronger in countries with lower levels of social expenditure. The latter finding provides some evidence for the crowding out-thesis but mainly suggests that a strong welfare state can take over the role of protective buffers in civil society, which is helpful as such buffers are less present among the most vulnerable social groups. The results of the analysis are discussed in relation to social science research and public policy.

AB - With the aftermath of the economic crisis starting to fold out, the extent and the conditions under which the experience of economic hardship thwarts subjective well-being spark academic interest. In this paper, we examine the cushioning impact of three immaterial buffers embedded within civil society—namely social networks, religiosity, and confidence in politics—in combination with the cushioning role of the welfare state. Analyzing the 2010 wave of the European Social Survey, the results confirm that the experience of economic hardship is inversely related to happiness. All three proposed protective measures cushion the negative impact of economic strain on happiness, whereby the positive effect of social networks and confidence in politics is stronger in countries with lower levels of social expenditure. The latter finding provides some evidence for the crowding out-thesis but mainly suggests that a strong welfare state can take over the role of protective buffers in civil society, which is helpful as such buffers are less present among the most vulnerable social groups. The results of the analysis are discussed in relation to social science research and public policy.

KW - Subjective well-being

KW - Economic hardship

KW - Resilience

KW - Crowding-out thesis

KW - Comparative welfare state analysis

KW - European Social Survey

U2 - 10.1007/s10902-016-9716-2

DO - 10.1007/s10902-016-9716-2

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 41

EP - 62

JO - Journal of Happiness Studies

JF - Journal of Happiness Studies

SN - 1389-4978

IS - 1

ER -